dirección mostrada y elimine el
mensaje original. Gracias.
-Original Message-
From: Darrell Rishel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:40 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people - comparison to 42 C.F.R. Part 2 (Al
cohol
-
From: Matthew Rosenblum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:02 PM
To: Darrell Rishel; 'WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List'
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people
Darrell,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. And now that you
brought it up, how
would you
.
This message is not legal advice or a binding signature.
-Original Message-
From: Vicki Hohner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Darrell Rishel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people - comparison to 42 C.F.R. Part 2
(Alcohol
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:02 PM
To: Darrell Rishel; 'WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List'
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people
Darrell,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. And now that you
brought it up, how
would you compare the 42 CFR consent with the (voluntary
remitente del E-Mail a la dirección mostrada y elimine el
mensaje original. Gracias.
-Original Message-
From: Darrell Rishel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:43 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people - comparison to 42 C.F.R
.
-Original Message-
From: Darrell Rishel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 5:11 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: HIPAA privacy and people
I really find many of these conversations entertaining (also frequently
enlightening and helpful
With the same due respect, and I, too, mean it sincerely, the word
'unworkable' is very tempting to apply to the whole HIPAA scenario where
there is an interface with patients.
Take a look at what all you very bright and well-intentioned folks have been
posting over the past several months. This
