RE: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-03 Thread rachelmcass
I would like to ask the group a related, but varied question, regarding
hybrid and affiliated entities.

Two scenarios:

1) Skilled Nursing facility has attached assisted living, with same
ownership (lets say we call this a single legal entity).  (Of course, the
nursing facility is Medicare/Medicaid certified, and the assisted living is
state certified.)  Assisted living does not conduct any electronic
transactions (all is done on paper), nursing facility does conduct
electronic transactions.  The two are distinct parts, offering distinct
services.

Is this a hybrid situation?  If so, I assume this should be documented.

2) Same situation, except 2 nursing facilities, and 2 assisted living,
separate legal entities, under common ownership as defined by the rule.

May the two facilities designate themselves as affiliated covered entities?
Should they include the assisted living as part of that designation?  Can
they avoid designating the assisted living as a covered component or entity?

I've got a handle on this Privacy thing, and even the covered entity thing,
but have just recently had questions regarding the definition of hybrid and
affiliated entities.  Seems a little tricky to me, depending upon one's
interpretation.

Any input will be appreciated.  Thanks.

-Original Message-
From: Scott F Kimbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 10:22 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: Covered Entity or Not


William,

This question always come up in my seminars, my standard answer is, you
may not have to legally comply, however HIPAA is meant to be best
business practices, it's meant to protect a patients privacy. Think
about it this way, on April 15 it's estimated over 10 million Notices of
Privacy practice will be sent out or acknowledged. You can bet a single
consumer will receive several, all indicating how each particular
healthcare provider will protect their personal health information.
Maybe they won't care that a particular provider doesn't give them one
of these documents, they will probably still hold them to the standard.

BTW the definition of in electronic form is as follows (from CMS)

In Electronic Form
Using electronic media, as that term is defined at 45 C.F.R. 162.103. It
includes transmissions over the Internet (wide-open), Extranet (using
Internet technology to link a business with information only accessible
to collaborating parties), leased lines, dial-up lines, and private
networks, and those transmissions that are physically moved from one
location to another using magnetic tape, disk, or CD media.

Hope this helps,
Scott Kimbel
Kimbel Morrow and Associates Inc.
866-598-2593




-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:54 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not

I believe you - I've heard nonsense interpretations along those lines in
the past, too.  But I have a solution.  In order for my chiropractor to
avoid sanctions and penalties for sending his electronic transaction via
his computer fax without using the standard X12 format, he can instead
fax it to a heavily capitalized clearinghouse with a large IT staff.
Since the clearinghouse can operate as a non-covered entity whenever it
damn well pleases, it can print out the fax and mail it to the payer for
35¢ plus postage.

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

- Original Message -
From: Rachel Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 02 February, 2003 02:32 PM
Subject: RE: Covered Entity or Not



According to CMS, yes, this scenario would constitute an electronic
transaction, and thus be subject to HIPAA requirements. This topic was
discussed a few weeks ago on another SNIP list (can't recall which one)
and HIPAAlive, I think. Zon Owen responded with a message that attempted
to bring insight into CMS' thinking about why this would be electronic
transactions - something along the lines of this being
computer-to-computer and thus electronic. William, you're good with the
archives of these lists - I bet you can find the thread in a heartbeat!

Don't yell at meI think this is one of the most ludicrous things
amongst myriad HIPAA ludicrous stuff.

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster  Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in Health Care EDI
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:52 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not


So, let's say I'm a part-time chiropractor and I have occasion to send
in a dozen or so claims a week. I get tired of hand-filling in the HCFA
1500, so I get a Word document template for the form and key data in,
perhaps with the aid of a macro

Re: Covered Entity or not

2003-02-03 Thread Doug Webb



Susan,
Well said.

Still another kink -- come October, you will have to file your 
Medicare claims electronically, which makes the loopholes even 
smaller.

IMHO, this makes just about anyoune who does "Health Care" a 
CE, except for those few providers who do a strictly cash business, and never 
file a claim with anyone.

I kind of expect that in another few years, large numbers of 
payors other than Medicare will be rejecting paper claims.

The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of 
LCMH.

Douglas M. WebbComputer System EngineerLittle Company of Mary 
Hospital  Health Care Centers[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"This electronic message may contain information that is confidential 
and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) 
and entity(s) named as recipients in the message. If you are not an 
intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender immediately, 
delete the material from any computer, do not deliver, distribute, or copy this 
message, and do not disclose its contents or take action in reliance on the 
information it contains. Thank you."



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List 
  
  Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 09:19 
  AM
  Subject: Covered Entity or not
  Everyone,We can argue all day long whether or not we 
  are a covered entity, but I think it makes good business decision to agree 
  that you are if you send in claims and be done with it.Look at this 
  situation, I don't know if many doctors or support staff realize this: 
  Anytime a claim is sent to Medicare, paper or electronic, it is coverted into 
  an electronic transaction because Medicare forwards it to 2nd insurance 
  companies. So now you are a covered entity. The only way to get 
  out of sending claims to Medicare is not to treat anyone who may have 
  Medicare. Who can afford to refuse to treat a large portion of our 
  society. Another kink- Medicare requires the doctor to file the claim 
  for the patient so don't think you can give the claim to the patient and he 
  files it for you. The loop holes for not being a covered entity 
  is so small, you almost have to practicing in the dark ages to not be a 
  covered entity. I think you just have to resign yourself that if 
  you practice and treat patient whether cash practice or not, you ARE A COVERED 
  ENTITY. At least that is what I am advising our clients, better safe 
  than sorry.Thanks,Susan BowesProfessional Procedures  
  ControlPractice Consulting Firm for the Small PractionerContact 
  info:211 Turner DriveReidsville, NC 27320Phone- 
  336-578-7461Fax- 336-578-7461 or 336-342-2030---The 
  WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The 
  discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual 
  participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of 
  Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your 
  question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. 
  These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or 
  discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not 
  intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional 
  communication at any time.You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy 
  as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To unsubscribe from this list, go to the 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email 
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED]If you need to unsubscribe 
  but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to 
  the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
  http://subscribe.wedi.org 
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org




RE: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-02 Thread Rachel Foerster
Fax is considered an electronic transaction by CMS if the document
originated as an electronic document in a computer system and is faxed from
that computer system.

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster  Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in Health Care EDI
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rfa-edi.com



-Original Message-
From: Noel Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:19 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not


Charles,

The definition of a covered entity entails more than just filing
electronic
claims.  There are several covered transactions and if you conduct any of
them electronically then you are a CE and must comply with HIPAA.

For a complete list of covered transactions refer to the Transaction and
Code Set Standards.

I would also note that the definition of conducting a
transaction electronically is often debated.  I know HHS has indicated in
the preamble to the Privacy Rule that a fax does not count as electronic
transmission.

Noel Chang
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)


-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:57:47 -0500
Subject: Covered Entity or Not

 At a meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers
 we had a discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on.  One of the
 organizations is a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated
 they do not bill electronically.  Therefore they are not a covered
 entity.  However, after further discussion they indicated they do in
 fact send via fax and/or email individual identifiable health
 information to other covered entities (ie hospitals, referral
 agencies, and referring agencies).  Some contended because they did
 not use EDI, they didn't really need to comply, others indicated
 they were because they do send PHI via electronic media.

 Can anyone provide an insight?

 Thanks.

 Charles.

 

 Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.

 Chief Operating Officer

 CAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.

 111 Middleton Road

 Danvers, MA 01923

 Phone: 978-739-7600

 FAX: 978-750-3620

 www.cabhealth.org

 *

 ---
 The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.
 The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of
 the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the
 views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to
 receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP
 Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs
 should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion
 of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not
 intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or
 unprofessional communication at any time.

 You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a
 blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you
 need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same
 as the address subscribed to the list, please use the
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org
--- End of Original Message ---


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board
of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and
services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal
disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as
the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe
form at http://subscribe.wedi.org


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services

Re: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-02 Thread William J. Kammerer
So, let's say I'm a part-time chiropractor and I have occasion to send
in a dozen or so claims a week. I get tired of hand-filling in the HCFA
1500, so I get a Word document template for the form and key data in,
perhaps with the aid of a macro. Then I use my Fax software on my laptop
to send the image of the Word document to the payer. Does that count as
an electronic transaction? Does that now make me a covered entity? Will
I now get in trouble, facing onerous fines and penalties?

That would be a hoot, considering that Clearinghouses think they can
(and undoubtedly will) dump claims to paper - even when providers send
electronic transactions to them in the first place! The clearinghouse
simply says it's not a covered entity for the moment!

Where's the justice (or administrative simplification) in all of this?
What kind of Bizarro world is this?

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

- Original Message -
From: Rachel Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 02 February, 2003 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: Covered Entity or Not

Fax is considered an electronic transaction by CMS if the document
originated as an electronic document in a computer system and is faxed
from that computer system.

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster  Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in Health Care EDI
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rfa-edi.com



-Original Message-
From: Noel Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:19 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not


Charles,

The definition of a covered entity entails more than just filing
electronic claims. There are several covered transactions and if you
conduct any of them electronically then you are a CE and must comply
with HIPAA.

For a complete list of covered transactions refer to the Transaction
and Code Set Standards.

I would also note that the definition of conducting a transaction
electronically is often debated. I know HHS has indicated in the
preamble to the Privacy Rule that a fax does not count as electronic
transmission.

Noel Chang
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)



- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 31 January, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: Covered Entity or Not



At a meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers we
had a discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on. One of the
organizations is a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated
they do not bill electronically. Therefore they are not a covered
entity. However, after further discussion they indicated they do in fact
send via fax and/or email individual identifiable health information to
other covered entities (ie hospitals, referral agencies, and referring
agencies). Some contended because they did not use EDI, they didn't
really need to comply, others indicated they were because they do send
PHI via electronic media.

Can anyone provide an insight?

Thanks.

Charles.




Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.


Chief Operating Officer


CAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.


111 Middleton Road


Danvers, MA 01923


Phone: 978-739-7600


FAX: 978-750-3620


www.cabhealth.org



---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org



Re: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-02 Thread Zon Owen





Charles,

You will need to consider each of the affected 
business transactions, andyou will also need to consider whether or not 
any of those transactions are done electronically by others, such as billing 
services, in your behalf.

HIPAA does not require that a provider use any of 
the electronic transaction standards unless they are conducting the associated 
underlying business processes electronically, with fax* and voice-over-telephone 
not being considered electronic.

For HIPAA purposes, a fax 
would be considered electronic if it was sent from one computer to 
another. If that was done as part of one of the defined transactions, then 
that would make you covered. Similarly, sending information that accomplishes one of those 
purposes via e-mail, or in a Word document, oras a portable document file 
(pdf), would be an electronic exchange.

Also, keep in mind that we 
are discussing specific business transactions here; whether or not your 
exchanges include PHI is not relevant to the coveredness 
determination.

So,let's go down the list:

If you do not submit either claims of the 
equivalent encounter information electronically, you may be OK. But are 
you sure that no one else, such as a billing service, does any electronic 
billing or posting for you? If you dispense drugs, are those also billed 
manually?

If the only way that you check on patient 
eligibilityis by making a phone call, or by mailing a form, you may be 
OK. But how do you carry out this business process? If you use 
e-mail, or a web page, you're covered.


If the only way that you check onthe status 
of a previously submitted claimis by making a phone call, or by mailing a 
form, you may be OK. But how do you carry out this business process? 
If you use an e-mail or a payer's web page to check this, that's 
electronic.


If the only way that you apply for a referral 
certification or authorization is by making a phone call, or by mailing a form, 
you may be OK. But how do you carry out this business 
process?

If you receive all of your payments from health 
plans on check and all of your explanations of those payments from them on 
paper, then you may be OK. But does a billing service or a bank do any of 
your payment processing for you? If so, do they do any of that 
electronically?

If you are not doing any of the previously listed 
transactions electronically with anyone, then it is highly unlikely that you are 
using any of the others, but those "others" would include the 
following:

- Enrollment  Disenrollment in a health 
plan.

- Payment of premiumsto a health 
plan.

- Coordination of Benefits with a health plan 
(this is usuallydone between health plans).

- Claim Attachments (no rule has been published 
yet, so it shouldn't be relevant yet).

- First Report of Injury (no rule has been 
published yet, so it shouldn't be relevant yet).

So, in summary, none of the HIPAA Administrative 
Simplification provisions, including privacy and security, will apply to you if 
you really don't do any of these processes electronically. But you cannot 
be conducting any of the above transactions electronically, and no one else can 
be doing any of them in your behalf. And you would still need to manage 
your privacy and security risks, and many other federal and state laws affect 
your requirements for those.

Hope that helps!

- Zon Owen -
(808)597-8493

- Original Message -

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
  "WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 
  Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:57:47 -0500Subject: Covered Entity or NotAt a 
  meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers we had a 
  discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on. One of the organizations is 
  a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated they do not "bill" 
  electronically. Therefore they are not a covered entity. However, 
  after further discussion, they indicated they do in fact send via fax and/or 
  email individual identifiable health information to other covered entities 
  (i.e. hospitals, referral agencies, and referring agencies). Some 
  contended because they did not use EDI, they didn't really need to comply, 
  others indicated they were because they do send PHI via electronic 
  media.Can anyone provide an 
  insight?Thanks.Charles.
  Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.Chief 
  Operating OfficerCAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.111 Middleton 
  RoadDanvers, MA 01923Phone: 978-739-7600FAX: 978-750-3620www.cabhealth.org
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor 

RE: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-02 Thread Scott F Kimbel
William,
  
This question always come up in my seminars, my standard answer is, you
may not have to legally comply, however HIPAA is meant to be best
business practices, it's meant to protect a patients privacy. Think
about it this way, on April 15 it's estimated over 10 million Notices of
Privacy practice will be sent out or acknowledged. You can bet a single
consumer will receive several, all indicating how each particular
healthcare provider will protect their personal health information.
Maybe they won't care that a particular provider doesn't give them one
of these documents, they will probably still hold them to the standard.

BTW the definition of in electronic form is as follows (from CMS)

In Electronic Form
Using electronic media, as that term is defined at 45 C.F.R. 162.103. It
includes transmissions over the Internet (wide-open), Extranet (using
Internet technology to link a business with information only accessible
to collaborating parties), leased lines, dial-up lines, and private
networks, and those transmissions that are physically moved from one
location to another using magnetic tape, disk, or CD media.

Hope this helps,
Scott Kimbel
Kimbel Morrow and Associates Inc.
866-598-2593

   


-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:54 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not

I believe you - I've heard nonsense interpretations along those lines in
the past, too.  But I have a solution.  In order for my chiropractor to
avoid sanctions and penalties for sending his electronic transaction via
his computer fax without using the standard X12 format, he can instead
fax it to a heavily capitalized clearinghouse with a large IT staff.
Since the clearinghouse can operate as a non-covered entity whenever it
damn well pleases, it can print out the fax and mail it to the payer for
35¢ plus postage.

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

- Original Message -
From: Rachel Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 02 February, 2003 02:32 PM
Subject: RE: Covered Entity or Not



According to CMS, yes, this scenario would constitute an electronic
transaction, and thus be subject to HIPAA requirements. This topic was
discussed a few weeks ago on another SNIP list (can't recall which one)
and HIPAAlive, I think. Zon Owen responded with a message that attempted
to bring insight into CMS' thinking about why this would be electronic
transactions - something along the lines of this being
computer-to-computer and thus electronic. William, you're good with the
archives of these lists - I bet you can find the thread in a heartbeat!

Don't yell at meI think this is one of the most ludicrous things
amongst myriad HIPAA ludicrous stuff.

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster  Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in Health Care EDI
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:52 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity or Not


So, let's say I'm a part-time chiropractor and I have occasion to send
in a dozen or so claims a week. I get tired of hand-filling in the HCFA
1500, so I get a Word document template for the form and key data in,
perhaps with the aid of a macro. Then I use my Fax software on my laptop
to send the image of the Word document to the payer. Does that count as
an electronic transaction? Does that now make me a covered entity? Will
I now get in trouble, facing onerous fines and penalties?

That would be a hoot, considering that Clearinghouses think they can
(and undoubtedly will) dump claims to paper - even when providers send
electronic transactions to them in the first place! The clearinghouse
simply says it's not a covered entity for the moment!

Where's the justice (or administrative simplification) in all of this?
What kind of Bizarro world is this?

William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320

- Original Message -
From: Rachel Foerster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 02 February, 2003 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: Covered Entity or Not

Fax is considered an electronic transaction by CMS if the document
originated as an electronic document in a computer system and is faxed
from that computer system.

Rachel Foerster
Principal
Rachel Foerster  Associates, Ltd.
Professionals in Health Care EDI
39432 North Avenue
Beach Park, IL 60099
Voice: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rfa-edi.com



-Original Message-
From: Noel Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 8:19 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Re: Covered Entity

Re: Covered Entity or Not

2003-02-01 Thread Noel Chang
Charles,

The definition of a covered entity entails more than just filing electronic 
claims.  There are several covered transactions and if you conduct any of 
them electronically then you are a CE and must comply with HIPAA.  

For a complete list of covered transactions refer to the Transaction and 
Code Set Standards.

I would also note that the definition of conducting a 
transaction electronically is often debated.  I know HHS has indicated in 
the preamble to the Privacy Rule that a fax does not count as electronic 
transmission.  

Noel Chang
--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)


-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:57:47 -0500
Subject: Covered Entity or Not

 At a meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers 
 we had a discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on.  One of the 
 organizations is a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated 
 they do not bill electronically.  Therefore they are not a covered 
 entity.  However, after further discussion they indicated they do in 
 fact send via fax and/or email individual identifiable health 
 information to other covered entities (ie hospitals, referral 
 agencies, and referring agencies).  Some contended because they did 
 not use EDI, they didn't really need to comply, others indicated 
 they were because they do send PHI via electronic media.
 
 Can anyone provide an insight?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Charles.
 
 
 
 Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.
 
 Chief Operating Officer
 
 CAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.
 
 111 Middleton Road
 
 Danvers, MA 01923
 
 Phone: 978-739-7600
 
 FAX: 978-750-3620
 
 www.cabhealth.org
 
 *
 
 ---
 The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. 
 The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of 
 the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the 
 views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to 
 receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP 
 Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs 
 should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion 
 of specific vendor products and services.  They also are not 
 intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
 unprofessional communication at any time.
 
 You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a 
 blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you 
 need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same 
 as the address subscribed to the list, please use the 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org
--- End of Original Message ---


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org



RE: Covered Entity or Not

2003-01-31 Thread Boyle, Joan
A provider is a covered entity under HIPAA if the provider sends any of the
HIPAA mandated transactions electronically.  Once a provider sends one of
these transactions, he/she is in and must comply with the privacy and
security requirements of HIPAA as well as those for the electronic
transactions.  If a provider does not send any of the HIPAA electronic
transactions (using EDI or via a direct data entry system OR through an
agent such as a billing service), the provider is not a HIPAA covered entity
and is not required to abide by the privacy standards.  Use of a fax to send
information does not qualify as using a HIPAA electronic transaction.
Strange as it may seem, such a provider can send protected health
information by fax or e-mail (shudder) and the HIPAA cops can't get him.  

However, who is to say what vulnerability there might be from litigation if
such a provider does not observe the standard of care that HIPAA privacy
regulations have established for the healthcare industry?

Joan
Joan Boyle
HIPAA Compliance Manager
The TriZetto Group, Inc.
Voice:  970-627-1675
Fax: 970-627-1677
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** Confidentiality Notice ***
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected
by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this
message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
strictly prohibited.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:58 AM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: Covered Entity or Not


At a meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers we had
a discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on.  One of the organizations is
a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated they do not bill
electronically.  Therefore they are not a covered entity.  However, after
further discussion they indicated they do in fact send via fax and/or email
individual identifiable health information to other covered entities (ie
hospitals, referral agencies, and referring agencies).  Some contended
because they did not use EDI, they didn't really need to comply, others
indicated they were because they do send PHI via electronic media.

Can anyone provide an insight?

Thanks.

Charles.




Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.


Chief Operating Officer


CAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.


111 Middleton Road


Danvers, MA 01923


Phone: 978-739-7600


FAX: 978-750-3620


www.cabhealth.org


*



---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board
of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and
services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal
disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as
the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe
form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org



Re: Covered Entity or Not

2003-01-31 Thread Leah Hole-Curry
The answer is in the covered entity definition found at 160.103
Covered entity means...A health care provider who transmits any health
information in electronic form in connection with a transaction covered
by this subchapter

So the transmission must be in connection with a standard transaction
(e.g. claims, eligibility, encounter, claims status, referal
certification and authorization, etc.)

Regards, lhc
Leah Hole-Curry, JD
FOX Systems, Inc.
602.708.1045 
Information transmitted is confidential and may be proprietary to FOX
Systems, Inc.  It is intended only for the person or entity to which it
is addressed.   Anyone else is prohibited from disclosing, copying, or
disseminating the contents or attachments.  If you receive this in
error, please notify sender immediately, or us at www.foxsys.com and
delete from your system.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/03 08:59 AM 
At a meeting yesterday of our parent organization's privacy officers we
had
a discussion I'd appreciate some feedback on.  One of the organizations
is
a long-term care/retirement facility that indicated they do not bill
electronically.  Therefore they are not a covered entity.  However,
after
further discussion they indicated they do in fact send via fax and/or
email
individual identifiable health information to other covered entities (ie
hospitals, referral agencies, and referring agencies).  Some contended
because they did not use EDI, they didn't really need to comply, others
indicated they were because they do send PHI via electronic media.

Can anyone provide an insight?

Thanks.

Charles.




Charles R. Carnahan, M.Div., M.B.A.


Chief Operating Officer


CAB Health and Recovery Services, Inc.


111 Middleton Road


Danvers, MA 01923


Phone: 978-739-7600


FAX: 978-750-3620


www.cabhealth.org


*



---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of
the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an
official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products
and services.  They also are not intended to be used as a forum for
personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the
same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the
Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org


---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.   These listservs should not be used for 
commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services.  
They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or 
unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the 
address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at 
http://subscribe.wedi.org