[weewx-development] Re: continuation of discussion on wxMesh MQTT

2017-02-23 Thread gjr80
Yes, this 'downstream consumer' does not handle partial packets properly. It's on the to-do list. Gary On Thursday, 23 February 2017 23:11:07 UTC+10, mwall wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 7:59:13 AM UTC-5, Bill Morrow wrote: >> >> I discovered a possible problem with this approa

[weewx-development] Re: continuation of discussion on wxMesh MQTT

2017-02-23 Thread mwall
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 7:59:13 AM UTC-5, Bill Morrow wrote: > > I discovered a possible problem with this approach working well with other > parts of weewx. Last night I was attempting to get the Realtime Gauge-Data ( > https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-realtime_gauge-data) extension goi

[weewx-development] Re: continuation of discussion on wxMesh MQTT

2017-02-23 Thread Wysiwyg
Hi Bill, Not sure it helps, but I output some loop packet of my Oregon station (WMRS200 using WMR100 driver provided with weewx: LOOP: 2017-02-22 12:33:40 CET (1487763220) altimeter: None, appTemp: None, barometer: None, cloudbase: None, dateTime: 1487763220, dewpoint: None, heatindex: None, h

[weewx-development] Re: continuation of discussion on wxMesh MQTT

2017-02-23 Thread Bill Morrow
I discovered a possible problem with this approach working well with other parts of weewx. Last night I was attempting to get the Realtime Gauge-Data (https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-realtime_gauge-data) extension going, and ran in to a problem because not each packet the my wxMesh driver subscri