Re: [weewx-development] Feature Request : Add calculate method standard OMM on daily database

2020-05-05 Thread Tom Keffer
Sorry. Can you give us more details? I do not know what the OMM standard is. And, I don't know what you mean by "Weewx calculate each 00AM to 00PM" On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:07 AM Florentin Prevost wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if it possible in futur to add in database values > from OMM

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Tom Keffer
As I said earlier, I put quite a bit of time trying to get pip to work. You can see the results in the 'pip' branch of the repository. NB: it's a work in progress, so the branch is not a "finished" dead end, but rather an "idea" dead end. It follows your

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread mwall
On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 2:24:47 PM UTC-4, Till Maas wrote: > > > By using the standard method, it would be also very easy to package for > different distributions, since they are optimised for the default > approach. For example Fedora supports automatically generating the > python

Re: [weewx-development] Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Chris Alemany
I was actually looking at the “brew” system, which is Linux and MacOS friendly, just yesterday to see how packages were created in that system. It might be a good candidate? Cheers Chris > On May 5, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Vince Skahan writes: > >> Problem is that every

Re: [weewx-development] Re: Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:53:13PM -0700, Vince Skahan wrote: > > Certainly. Too many scope-increase meetings on the project from hell at > work I guess. Sorry if I jumped the gun :-) > > Anyway, I guess I always try to think "*it it was my money funding this, > would I invest here at this

Re: [weewx-development] Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Greg Troxel
Vince Skahan writes: > Problem is that every os, and every packaging system, expect 'their' paths > to be 'the' standard. There are some very slight variations, but the venerable BSD hier(7) was changed fairly little into FHS. And, autoconf is the ur-typ of how this is done, with --etcdir and

Re: [weewx-development] Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Greg Troxel
My $0.02, coming from packaging many things: People who develop a particular package are very used to how it is built, and so more or less however that works is fine for them. People that are coming to something new, or packaging systems that have say 20K packages, would like to see a

Re: [weewx-development] Package weewx like other python projects

2020-05-05 Thread Till Maas
Hi Tom, On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:26:11PM -0700, Tom Keffer wrote: > Sounds like it would break a LOT of stuff! > > It has been painful enough getting extension writers to embrace Python 3 > and WeeWX 4. But, that transition required them only to rewrite an > extension in Python 3. Old