Dani,
You are quite right, obvious when pointed out!
I think its correct to assume that FFFE part of the packet means there has
been rainfall in the last hour. I have just run another test:
b111003f0e01010c00011d = 0 rain fall in the last hour (some in
the last 24 hours)
Hi Rob,
Regarding the rain faill per hour, I am not sure if what you proposed is
correct. What you are doing in your code, if I understood you correctly, is
the following:
if packet[2:4].encode('hex')!='fffe':
Rh = None
else:
Rh =
Hello again.
Through further testing I think it is the UV sensor.
For example:
b3050100b8 -> ignore b3, gives 5 : 1 : 0 : 185
b3050200ba -> ignore b3, gives 5 : 2 : 0 : 186
So bit 1 always gives 5 - Could be battery status not sure
Bit 2 seems to tally with what the WMR89 is displaying on
Hello all,
I have been using the driver posted by fcauwe for a little while and am
getting data through from the WMR89.
I did notice that it was not reporting rain fall per hour. Looking through
the code I found the following if statement under *def
_wmr89_rain_packet(self, packet):*
if
Hello again,
I have been experimenting with François drivers since last Wednesday and I
have found a couple of problems:
- In the driver, the rain packet does not contain the attribute *rain*.
I have used the version from WMR100 driver and I think it is working
correctly now:
Thank you very much for your efforts doing this driver for WMR89.
Like Timolavi, my WMR88 died yesterday and I am looking for a replacement
with which I can reuse my old sensors. WMR89 seems perfect, despite the
driver problem... I am running Weewx in a Raspberry Pi, do you know if your
driver
Hi,
I'm happy to hear you got it working, I update my github with you
modification;
https://github.com/fcauwe/weewx
I noticed that the barometer only opdates every 15 minutes, so I have
modified the "archive_interval" to "900", now I always have barometer
data on the WOW site.
François
Timo
I did get my WMR89 this monday for replacement for 5 years old WMR88, which
starts to shown some defunction features.
oon appeared that direct replacement was not possible. I found this
fcauwe's driver and instruction to modify cp210x-driver. I changed cp210x
source code
from
mwall schreef op ma 05-02-2018 om 12:22 [-0800]:
>
>
> françois,
>
> nice work on the wmr89 driver!
>
> could you describe the system configuration on which you run it?
> specifically, what is the architecture, operating system, kernel
> version, and serial driver version?
>
> there is
On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 3:13:38 PM UTC-5, fcauwe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With help of others I created a driver for the WMR89,
>
> You can find it here:
> https://github.com/fcauwe/weewx/blob/master/bin/weewx/drivers/wmr89.py
> You have tell the linux kernel to use the cp210X serial driver for
Hi,
With help of others I created a driver for the WMR89,
You can find it here:
https://github.com/fcauwe/weewx/blob/master/bin/weewx/drivers/wmr89.py
You have tell the linux kernel to use the cp210X serial driver for this
device.
sudo sh -c 'echo 0fde ca0a >
Ok then. Thanks for your help and ideas. I have boxed up the Wx station
and it will be returned tomorrow. I will probably set this project aside
until next March or April (unless I come across a killer deal on a station
that is on the list of tested stations).
Thanks for the advice.
Kevin
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 4:13:29 PM UTC-5, Kevin Hedgepeth wrote:
>
> I came across an OS WMR89. I contacted Oregon Scientific prior to getting
> the 89 and I was told that the 88 and 89 are identical in operation; the 89
> is the current model on the market.
>
you were given incorrect
13 matches
Mail list logo
