Hi Gazza,
The 'if' statement is on the right hand side of the '=' sign is actually a
ternary operator. Read the expression as :
if obj.get('battery_ok') == 'OK':
pkt['battery'] = 1
else:
pkt['battery']=0
(In python Numeric zero, None or False all evaluate to
Hi Rob,
I don't know much about python so can you explain how the new version of
the battery status works as I still have to sort that for my mates station.
if 'battery_ok' in obj:
pkt['battery'] = 1 if obj.get('battery_ok') == 'OK' else 0
If the received data is
Thanks. In the end I kept the sensor name the same and mimiced the code for
parse_json() from another posting so its compatible with both versions of
rtl_433.
NB original version of sdr.py parses battery status the wrong way round (0
is False, 1 is True). Seems to be a common problem in lots
As you have alredy found this is another case where rtl_433 has changed the
reported info from what is expected by sdr.py V0.77.
For this station it looks like most of the strings have changed.
In the 'class OSWGR800Packet(Packet):' section of sdr.py try changing these
bits,
from
Hi,
I have done some more research and it looks like there was a change in
RTL_433 at tag 19.08 (August 2019) that changed the naming convention for a
significant number of wind related fields for lots of sensors. I guess
sdr.py needs to be updated to take this into account. I would offer but
