Yes, it's possible. 2024-01-19 18:27:35 weewxd[5855] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:27:35 weewxd[5855] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds LOOP: 2024-01-19 18:27:35 CET (1705685255) 'altimeter': '1023.2565915245989', 'appTemp': '-4.6378894597484965', 'barometer': '1026.3446847507096', 'cloudbase': '972.4294835518078', 'dateTime': '1705685255', 'daymaxwind': '2.1', 'dayRain': '4.7', 'dewpoint': '-6.267050581532717', 'ET': 'None', 'extraHumid6': '62', 'extraHumid7': '61', 'extraHumid8': '58', 'extraTemp6': '14.8', 'extraTemp7': '19.9', 'extraTemp8': '20.6', 'heatindex': '-1.9000000000000008', 'humidex': '-1.9', 'inDewpoint': '12.462345522375951', 'inHumidity': '60', 'inTemp': '20.5', 'lightning_distance': 'None', 'lightning_last_det_time': '1705345360', 'lightning_strike_count': '0', 'lightningcount': '0', 'luminosity': '0.0', 'maxSolarRad': '0.0', 'monthRain': '50.4', 'outHumidity': '72', 'outTemp': '-1.9', 'p_dayRain': '0.0', 'p_monthRain': '26.5', 'p_rain': '0.0', 'p_rainRate': '0.0', 'p_stormRain': '0.0', 'p_weekRain': '11.8', 'p_yearRain': '26.5', 'pressure': '971.0', 'radiation': '0.0', 'rain': '0.0', 'rainRate': '0.0', 'relbarometer': '1023.8', 'stormRain': '0.0', 'usUnits': '17', 'UV': '0', 'uvradiation': '0.0', 'weekRain': '15.2', 'wh31_ch6_batt': '0', 'wh31_ch6_sig': '4', 'wh31_ch7_batt': '0', 'wh31_ch7_sig': '4', 'wh31_ch8_batt': '0', 'wh31_ch8_sig': '4', 'wh32_batt': '0', 'wh32_sig': '4', 'wh40_batt': '1.45', 'wh40_sig': '4', 'wh57_batt': '5', 'wh57_sig': '4', 'windchill': '-1.9000000000000008', 'windDir': 'None', 'windGust': '1.3', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '0.0', 'ws90_batt': '3.28', 'ws90_sig': '4', 'yearRain': '50.4'
But why would anybody want to do this? I have two GW2000 devices and want to store and show data of as many of my sensor possible in a single weewx instance. Yet configuring the driver both, as driver and a service at the same time, seems to work as I hoped at least foor LOOP: two device queries, on LOOP data. The question now: is it possible to configure the driver/service in a way, they uses their own ip_address and is it possible to map the Wind/Dir/Gust of the WS90 bound to the one GW2000, to e.g. us_windSpeed/us_windDir/us_windGust (us for ultrasonic) just like p_rain for the haptic array? Or isn't this possible and do I have to combine the Interceptor driver with the Ecowitt Gateway Driver, one as a service, the other as a Driver to achieve this? If yes, how could this be possible, I tried it with Interceptor as a driver and Ecowitt Gateway Driver as a Service and get not device data: 2024-01-19 18:46:59 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue 2024-01-19 18:47:07 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:47:09 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue 2024-01-19 18:47:16 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:47:19 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue 2024-01-19 18:47:25 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:47:29 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue 2024-01-19 18:47:34 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:47:39 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue 2024-01-19 18:47:43 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.gw1000: Next update in 9 seconds 2024-01-19 18:47:49 weewxd[13771] DEBUG user.interceptor: empty queue -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/0417240b-fb99-477a-b599-98fdb5969357n%40googlegroups.com.
