Antoine, I think the Weld 2.x behaviour is correct per the spec.
GlobalRepositoryImpl is not a passivation capable dependency (@Singleton
is not a normal scope)...
M
Dne 22.11.2013 11:54, Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a):
In my experience, Weld 1.1.x supported @Singleton,
Weld 2.x don’t support
I don’t totally agree on your point Martin : @Dependent scope is not a normal
scope as well but I can inject a dependent scope bean in a normal scope bean.
I don’t say it’s a bug since the spec seems to be a bit blur on the subject.
I wanted just to stress that
1. Singleton don’t behave like
Yes, it should. Can you point me to the example?
On 11/22/2013 03:38 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Arun Gupta has a JAX-RS example using @Singleton. Resteasy first tries
to delegate to a CDI beanmanager to create the resource instance before
it relies on a default mechanism. Should the BeanManager
Dne 22.11.2013 15:37, Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a):
I don’t totally agree on your point Martin : @Dependent scope is not a normal
scope as well but I can inject a dependent scope bean in a normal scope bean.
Yep, but it must be passivation capable - this is explicitly written in
the spec,
