[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Update of bug #11011 (project wesnoth): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Update of bug #11011 (project wesnoth): Status:None => Fixed ___ Follow-up Comment #5: It is now possibel for wml authors to implement this in lua using the wesnoth.wml_conditionals

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Update of bug #11011 (project wesnoth): Status: Postponed = None Assigned to: cib = None ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Removing Postponed

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #11011 (project wesnoth): I was rather thinking of something along SQL syntax regarding keyword IN So for example if $foo = 'something' and $foobar[] = {'aaa','something','etc'} [variable] name=foo find_in=foobar [/variable] would evaluate to true.

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?11011 Summary: Enable 'find_in' for [variable] Project: Battle for Wesnoth Submitted by: cycholka Submitted on: Friday 02/08/2008 at 13:01 Category: Feature Request Severity: 1 -

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #11011 (project wesnoth): You could be a bit more specific, I need to guess here pretty much. Do you mean this? [if] [variable] find_in=my_array key=x equals=1 [/variable] [/if] Well, that might not be the best syntax, but I can't think of something better.

[Wesnoth-bugs] [bug #11011] Enable 'find_in' for [variable]

Update of bug #11011 (project wesnoth): Status:None = Postponed Assigned to:None = cib ___ Reply to this item at: