As you probably (don't :) ) know I volunteered to do an WML rewrite of
UtBS. After doing some work on the first scenario and in depth analysis
of the rest, and surrounding utils there are two conclusions:
1) The present WML is rather unsalvageable, it's bloated, unprecise and
conceptualy ugly.
well, if a rewrite is needed, let's do a rewrite...
that's what dev versions are for :)
On 4/25/07, Mist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you probably (don't :) ) know I volunteered to do an WML rewrite of
UtBS. After doing some work on the first scenario and in depth analysis
of the rest, and
Hi,
There an UtbS bug [1] which seems to expose some problems in the WML
event handling. Cycholka posted a testcase[2] made by Zookeeper.
There are 2 units both with a die event.
* Unit 1, Jack, is stored
* A third unit kills the second unit, Horsie
* The death event of the Horsie runs, kills
Hi,
anybody against this idea?
http://www.wesnoth.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15849
If not I'm going to look at it soon.
Regards,
Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew
___
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 20:28:22 +0200,
Elias Pschernig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. We include the DLL - it comes with the official python installer,
so it can't be that problematic to re-distribute it with the Windows
installer, if otherwise it doesn't work.
I don't think it is safe to
Mark de Wever [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
anybody against this idea?
http://www.wesnoth.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15849
No objection here.
--
a href=http://www.catb.org/~esr/;Eric S. Raymond/a
___
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
Wiith the NR merge coming up, I decided to give macroscope the
capability to find and detect cliques of duplicate files, so I
can drop redundant copies of images in NR.
You can generate this report by going to data/tools and typing
make collisions
My code uses MD5 hashing rather than
