On Monday 14 May 2007 21:35:04 Eric S. Raymond wrote:
If it is really a problem we should probably use some more conventional
filenames like _main.cfg instead of %main.cfg for example.
Alas, it appears the ls(1) sort algorithm ignores all leading
non-alphanumerics.
It depends on your system
Personally, I don't feel that there would be much loss to the
character of the Orcs if they said tree-huggers instead of
tree-shaggers. Is it so important to the storyline for them to use
the more vulger phase that such a small change should not be made?
--
John McNabb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Personally, I don't feel that there would be much loss to the
character of the Orcs if they said tree-huggers instead of
tree-shaggers. Is it so important to the storyline for them to use
the more vulger phase that such a small change should not be made?
I
Can you be more explicit about why it is not a small change as far as
its importance to the storyline of the campaign?
On 5/15/07, Eric S. Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John McNabb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Personally, I don't feel that there would be much loss to the
character of the Orcs if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
why is core stuff inside the campaigns folder?
Because, in this draft of the reorganization, the 'campaigns'
folder really becomes a 'packages' folder with the name
'campaigns' kept for backwards compatibility.
Layout reproduced for reference:
wesnoth
I agree tree-hugger would be ridiculous.
No one is suggesting that the orcs need to be polite.
But is it not in your power to cook up a less vulgar epithet for the
elves?
You managed it for the dwarves and humans.
-eleazar / j.w.bjerk
On May 15, 2007, at 5:48 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree tree-hugger would be ridiculous.
No one is suggesting that the orcs need to be polite.
But is it not in your power to cook up a less vulgar epithet for the
elves?
You managed it for the dwarves and humans.
Trust me, if I could have invented
Why are we having this discussion? Why are we dedicating such
_exegesis to a word that 10-year olds would openly laugh at for its
quaintness?
This censorship is going way over its bounds, if you ask me. I do
not think it is doing anything to further its stated goal; and as
evidenced by
