Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
>> On the other hand, we don't want every trash macro in the universe in
>> the default load path, because reading WML costs load time.
>
> How many seconds does this currently consume?
15 seconds on gp2x, with generated cache.
--
pozdrawiam
Karol 'grzywacz' Nowak
-> Ja
On Wednesday, 18 April 2007 04:58, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> This is for after the 1.3.2 release.
>
> I intend to move on this after 1.3.2 release, unless someone
> explains to me why it would be a bad idea. It's my second agenda
> item after merging Northern Rebirth.
I really like the idea of havi
Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On the other hand, we don't want every trash macro in the universe in
> > the default load path, because reading WML costs load time.
>
> How many seconds does this currently consume?
On my 1.8Ghz Athlon 64 maxhine, the WML load seems to take about a
seco
> On the other hand, we don't want every trash macro in the universe in
> the default load path, because reading WML costs load time.
How many seconds does this currently consume?
Jeff
___
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.o
This is for after the 1.3.2 release.
As some of you suspected, a goodly number of the utility macros in
data/utils are very rarely used, often only by one campaign or
scenario. With macroscope this is very easy to check using the
--refcount option. Doing several runs with --from ../data/utils an
