I was using wget to "suck" a website, and found an interesting problem
some of the URLs it found contained a question mark, after which it
responded with "cannot write to '... insert file/URL here?more
text ...' (invalid argument).
And - it didn't save any of those URLs to files (o
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:42:19PM +0200, Jan Hnila wrote:
> Hallo!
>
> Nur eine Antwort auf deine zweite Frage:
> (von http://www.interlog.com/~tcharron/wgetwin.html)
Ja, das hab ich gelesen. Leider besteht hier (WinNT) keine Moeglichkeit
die Variablen zu setzen, wenn man das wget per Doppelkli
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Trautmann wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid that this is only little help, since the current virus fakes a
>> from by any other address from address book. But maybe it will help to
>> reduce the garbage from the list.
>
> Refusing mail
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 01:52:01PM +0200, Martin Trautmann wrote:
> On Thu 2002-06-06 (22:54), Johannes Tevessen wrote:
> > Sorry, I'll join the row of those who quit the list
> > because of *dozends* of ~150-160kB(!) mails with
> > viri and suspicious .EXEs.
I receive them as probe messages ("Me
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Trautmann wrote:
> I'm afraid that this is only little help, since the current virus fakes a
> from by any other address from address book. But maybe it will help to
> reduce the garbage from the list.
Refusing mails larger than 50K would've stopped almost all the rece
On Thu 2002-06-06 (22:54), Johannes Tevessen wrote:
> Sorry, I'll join the row of those who quit the list
> because of *dozends* of ~150-160kB(!) mails with
> viri and suspicious .EXEs.
I'd suggest to change the status of this list (temporarily?). Only
subscribed members are allowed to send messa
