Re: new string module

2005-01-05 Thread Dražen Kačar
Jan Minar wrote: What's wrong with mbrtowc(3) and friends? The mysterious solution is probably to use wprintf(3) instead printf(3). Couple of questions on #c on freenode would give you that answer. Historically, wget source was written in a way which allowed one to compile it on really old

Re: new string module

2005-01-05 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
Alle 02:46, mercoledì 5 gennaio 2005, Jan Minar ha scritto: as Fumitoshi UKAI suggested, the best choice would be to escape only the strings that need to be escaped. so, i think we should probably check together which strings passed to logprintf in the wget code need to be

Re: new string module

2005-01-05 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
Alle 18:28, mercoled 5 gennaio 2005, Draen Kaar ha scritto: Jan Minar wrote: What's wrong with mbrtowc(3) and friends? The mysterious solution is probably to use wprintf(3) instead printf(3). Couple of questions on #c on freenode would give you that answer. Historically, wget source was

RE: new string module

2005-01-05 Thread Tony Lewis
Mauro Tortonesi wrote: Alle 18:28, mercoled 5 gennaio 2005, Draen Kacar ha scritto: Jan Minar wrote: What's wrong with mbrtowc(3) and friends? The mysterious solution is probably to use wprintf(3) instead printf(3). Couple of questions on #c on freenode would give you that answer.