Re: wget ignores --user and --password if you have a .netrc

2007-09-04 Thread Josh Williams
On 9/3/07, Andreas Kohlbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, though the man page of wget mentions .netrc, I assume this is a bug. For my understanding if you provide a --user=user and --password=password at the command line this should overwrite any setting elsewhere, as in the .netrc. It

wget (centos build) page-requisites leaves requisites in a bad location

2007-09-04 Thread Ed
Seen this twice now but unable to track down how it happens. I am crawling a list of websites which are being kept in a cache area. My args (in ruby) are ARGS = --html-extension + --page-requisites + --force-directories + --convert-links +

Re: wget ignores --user and --password if you have a .netrc

2007-09-04 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Andreas Kohlbach wrote: Hi, though the man page of wget mentions .netrc, I assume this is a bug. For my understanding if you provide a --user=user and --password=password at the command line this should overwrite any setting elsewhere, as in

Re: wget (centos build) page-requisites leaves requisites in a bad location

2007-09-04 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ed wrote: Seen this twice now but unable to track down how it happens. I am crawling a list of websites which are being kept in a cache area. snip A small number of files end up in the wrong location, evidence from the logs indicates that

Re: wget ignores --user and --password if you have a .netrc

2007-09-04 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As Josh points out, the question remains whether this should be our behavior; I vote yes, as command-line arguments should always override rc files, in general. Of course, these values

Re: wget ignores --user and --password if you have a .netrc

2007-09-04 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Andreas Kohlbach wrote: On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 02:48:25PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As Josh points out, the question remains whether this should be our behavior; I vote yes, as