Micah Cowan wrote:
Yes, that appears to work quite well, as long as we seed it right;
starting with a consistent Xâ‚€ would be just as bad as trying them
sequentially, and choosing something that does not change several times
a second (such as time()) still makes it likely that multiple
Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, that appears to work quite well, as long as we seed it right;
starting with a consistent X₀ would be just as bad as trying them
sequentially, and choosing something that does not change several times
a second (such as time()) still makes it likely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the
On 10/18/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
ever get implemented?
In other words, is it possible to do:
wget --bind-address=1.2.3.4:2000-3000 http://...
From trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Oleg Ace wrote:
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
ever get implemented?
In other words, is it
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Oleg Ace wrote:
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
the classic pseudorandom shuffle algorithm you only need to keep a
count of the
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
the classic pseudorandom
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
certainly does not need to keep an array
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other
11 matches
Mail list logo
