Neil wrote:
When giving it some thought I think a
valid argument could be made that the string in the CSS document is not
exactly
an URL but it is certainly URL-like.
The URL-like strings in CSS are actually standard URLs, either absolute or
relative, so they shouldn't be a big deal to
J.F.Groff wrote:
Amazingly I found this feature request in a 2003 message to this very
mailing
list. Are there only a few lunatics like me who think this should be
included?
Wget is written and maintained by volunteers. What you need to find is a
lunatic willing to volunteer to write the code
Hi Tony,
Amazingly I found this feature request in a 2003 message to this very
mailing
list. Are there only a few lunatics like me who think this should be
included?
Wget is written and maintained by volunteers. What you need to find is a
lunatic willing to volunteer to write the code to
Oh wait. Somebody already did the patch!
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09502.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.wget.patches/1867
I guess it's up to maintainers to decide whether to include this in
the standard wget distribution. In the meantime, hearty thanks to
