[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think removing them is a bad idea. Even if very few people use
them, it good to have them. Personally, I've used --sslprotocol a
couple of times. IMO, all these choices are what makes Linux
console utils so powerful.
You're misunderstanding me: I'm not proposing
On Thursday 21 April 2005 19:07, Tony wrote:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The question is what should we do for 1.10? Document the
unreadable names and cryptic values, and have to support
them until eternity?
My vote is to change them to more reasonable syntax (as you suggested
earlier in the
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The question is what should we do for 1.10? Document the
unreadable names and cryptic values, and have to support
them until eternity?
My vote is to change them to more reasonable syntax (as you suggested
earlier in the note) for 1.10 and include the new syntax in the
