Re: Relevance of MACHINES

2003-11-17 Thread DervishD
Hi Hrvoje :) * Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > >> One way to fix this would be to accopmany the OS entries in MACHINES > >> with the version of Wget that they apply to. But the problem is that, > >> as each version is released, you will only see which machines the > >> *previous*

Re: Relevance of MACHINES

2003-11-17 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> One way to fix this would be to accopmany the OS entries in MACHINES >> with the version of Wget that they apply to. But the problem is that, >> as each version is released, you will only see which machines the >> *previous* versions worked on. > > But

Re: Relevance of MACHINES

2003-11-17 Thread DervishD
Hi Hrvoje :) * Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > I'm not sure how to manage the MACHINES file in the distribution. As > very few people keep testing the old operating systems documented in > MACHINES, it's impossible to guarantee that new versions of Wget will > compile or work on t

Relevance of MACHINES

2003-11-16 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
I'm not sure how to manage the MACHINES file in the distribution. As very few people keep testing the old operating systems documented in MACHINES, it's impossible to guarantee that new versions of Wget will compile or work on them. One way to fix this would be to accopmany the OS entries in MACH