Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +AC_CHECK_FUNCS(strtoll, , [
> + dnl The following taken from gnulib:
> + dnl Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether defines strtoimax as a macro])
> + AC_EGREP_CPP([inttypes_h_defines_strtoimax],
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 06:00:13PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We have something working now. I'll send a patch in a bit.
>
> Thanks.
Better late than never :)
Patch below against trunk.
The src/wget.h changes are cosmetic and can be ignored if yo
From: Hrvoje Niksic Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:00:34 -0700
> [...] -- after all, Wget has long
> supported platforms with much worse standard-conformance track
> records.
And it has long not supported others, like VMS, with better ones,
although I've tried to do what I could. (At least VMS has s
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [1]
>> Both C and POSIX require standard functions to also be defined as
>> functions, even if those that are normally invoked as macros of the
>> same name. The 2004 edition of POSIX explicitly speaks of strtoimax
>> and friends as "functions". See htt
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:59:59PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> >> OK, in presence of LFS, Wget will use either strtoll, strtoimax, or
> >> its own strtoll implementation if none are ava
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>> OK, in presence of LFS, Wget will use either strtoll, strtoimax, or
>> its own strtoll implementation if none are available.
>
> I looked at your configure.in change and it won't work. strto
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> OK, in presence of LFS, Wget will use either strtoll, strtoimax, or
> its own strtoll implementation if none are available.
I looked at your configure.in change and it won't work. strtoimax is a
macro on HP-UX. So, AC_CHECK_LIB won't
OK, in presence of LFS, Wget will use either strtoll, strtoimax, or
its own strtoll implementation if none are available.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:24:53PM -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > None of the following platforms have strtoll():
> > > HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11
> >
> > Do those platforms have 64-
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:17:18PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > None of the following platforms have strtoll():
> > HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11
>
> Do those platforms have 64-bit off_t, i.e. large file support? If so,
> do they have another strtoll-
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> None of the following platforms have strtoll():
> HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11
Do those platforms have 64-bit off_t, i.e. large file support? If so,
do they have another strtoll-like function, such as strtoq?
> There is a replacement strtoll() in gnulib
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:27:28PM -0500, Steven M. Schweda wrote:
>I haven't used HP-UX for a while, so I may be wasting your time, but
> I thought that 11.x was 64-bit-only. If so, does strtoll() actually
> differ from strtol()? (How big is your "long int"?)
11.x is 32-bit _and_ 64-bit. 10
I haven't used HP-UX for a while, so I may be wasting your time, but
I thought that 11.x was 64-bit-only. If so, does strtoll() actually
differ from strtol()? (How big is your "long int"?)
My VMS C RTL help says, "The strtoll and strtoq functions are
identical." Do you have a strtoq()?
-
None of the following platforms have strtoll():
HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11
There is a replacement strtoll() in gnulib but it's licensed under the
GPL. Would importing it conflict with wget license which contains the
OpenSSL exception?
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
14 matches
Mail list logo
