Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: I'll grab the other part and explain what curl does. It shows a current speed based on the past five seconds, Does it mean that the speed doesn't change for five seconds, or that you always show the *current* speed, but relative to the last five

RE: LAN with Proxy, no Router

2002-04-10 Thread Herold Heiko
.something in unix is a normal file, it just won't be displayed with a normal ls (similar to dir) without additional options (-a/-A). On most unixes, at least. The directory separator on unix is / , while \ is a escape character, meaning treat the next character as special/normal (opposite to the

Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Daniel Stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The meter is updated maximum once per second, I don't think it makes sense to update the screen faster than that. Maybe not, but I sort of like it. Wget's progress bar refreshes the screen (not more than) five times per second, and I like the idea of

Re: LAN with Proxy, no Router

2002-04-10 Thread Ian Abbott
On 10 Apr 2002 at 3:09, Jens Rösner wrote: wgetrc works fine under windows (always has) however, .wgetrc is not possible, but maybe . does mean in root dir under Unix? The code does different stuff for Windows. Instead of looking for '.wgetrc' in the user's home directory, it looks for a

Re: LAN with Proxy, no Router

2002-04-10 Thread Jens Rösner
Hi Ian! wgetrc works fine under windows (always has) however, .wgetrc is not possible, but maybe . does mean in root dir under Unix? The code does different stuff for Windows. Instead of looking for '.wgetrc' in the user's home directory, it looks for a file called 'wget.ini' in the

Re: New suggestion.

2002-04-10 Thread Ivan Buttinoni
On Monday 08 April 2002 19:18, you wrote: Ivan Buttinoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Again I send a suggestion, this time quite easy. I hope it's not allready implemented, else I'm sorry in advance. It will be nice if wget can use the regexp to evaluate what accept/refuse to download.

Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2002-04-10 01:14 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Andre Majorel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If find it very annoying when a downloader plays yoyo with the remaining time. IMHO, remaining time is by nature a long term thing and short term jitter should not cause it to go up and down.

Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Robin B. Lake
For what it's worth, I have sitting here a publication that provides the digital filter weights for various low-pass filters. Pick the number of points and the spectrum you want and there's a close fit. Rob Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10 12:06:02 2002 Mailing-List:

[¼ºÀα¤°í]»õ´ÜÀå ºòÀ̺¥Æ® ¼Ò½Ä

2002-04-10 Thread ´©µå
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä ? ´©µå¸ð¾Æ °í°´°ü¸®ÆÀÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ³»¿ë¿¡ ¾Õ¼­ ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚºÐÀº ¹Ýµå½Ã »èÁ¦ÇØÁÖ¼¼¿ä º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº 1ȸ¼ºÀ̹ǷΠµÎ¹ø´Ù½Ã ¹ß¼ÛµÇÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç ½Ç¼ö·Î 2¹øÀÌ»óÀÌ ¹ß¼ÛµÇ´õ¶óµµ ³Ê±×·¯ÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù. »çÀÌÆ®·Î À̵¿ÇϽ÷Á¸é Ŭ¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä ´©µå¸ð¾Æ »õ´ÜÀå ºòÀ̺¥Æ® À̺¥Æ®³»¿ë : 4¿ù°áÀçÀÚÁß

Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Roger L. Beeman
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Agreed wholeheartedly, but how would you *implement* a non-jittering ETA? Do you think it makes sense the way 1.8.1 does it, i.e. to calculate the ETA from the average speed? One common programming technique is the exponential decay model. I

Re: Current download speed in progress bar

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Roger L. Beeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Agreed wholeheartedly, but how would you *implement* a non-jittering ETA? Do you think it makes sense the way 1.8.1 does it, i.e. to calculate the ETA from the average speed? One common programming

ÎÆ ºÎ¾÷! ºÎ¾÷! ºÎ¾÷! ͱ

2002-04-10 Thread ¿î¿µÀÚ
Title: lldMail3-1 ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß, http://www..com/ ¿¡¼­ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä

Re: Debian bug 88176 - timestamping is wrong with -O

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Unfortunately, this bug is not easy to fix. The problem is that `-O' was originally invented for streaming, i.e. for `-O -'. As a result, many places in Wget's code assume that they can freely operate on the file names, and -O seems more like an afterthought. On the other hand, many people

Re: Debian bug 106391 - documentation doesn't warn about passwordsin urls

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[ Cc'ing to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as requested by Guillaume. ] Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this is from the advanced usage section of examples (info docs): * If you want to encode your own username and password to HTTP or FTP, use the appropriate URL syntax (*note URL

Re: Debian bug 131851 - cwd during ftp causes download to fail

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When getting a file in a non-root directory from FTP with wget, wget always tries CWD to that directory before getting the file. Unfortunately sometimes you're not allowed to CWD to a directory, but you're all allowed to list or download files from

Re: Debian wishlist bug 21148 - wget doesn't allow selectivitybased on mime type

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
I believe this is already on the todo list. However, this is made harder by the fact that, to implement this kind of reject, you have to start downloading the file. This is very different from the filename-based rejection, where the decision can be made at a very early point in the download

Re: spaces and other special caracters in directories

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Loic Le Loarer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When I fetch with wget a whole subtree and when directories contains space or some other special character, these character are urlencoded in the local version while it is not the case for files. For exemple if I mirror with wget -m the directory to

Re: feature wish: switch to disable robots.txt usage

2002-04-10 Thread Noel Koethe
On Mit, 10 Apr 2002, Jens Rösner wrote: Hello Jens, is it possible to get a new option to disable the usage of robots.txt (--norobots)? I think at least since 1.7, probably even longer. Cut from the doc: robots = on/off Use (or not) /robots.txt file (see Robots.). Be sure to know what

Re: feature wish: switch to disable robots.txt usage

2002-04-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Noel Koethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok got it. But it is possible to get this option as a switch for using it on the command line? Yes, like this: wget -erobots=off ...

Re: feature wish: switch to disable robots.txt usage

2002-04-10 Thread Jens Rösner
Hi! Just to be complete, thanks to Hrvoje's tip, I was able to find -e command --execute command Execute command as if it were a part of .wgetrc (see Startup File.). A command thus invoked will be executed after the commands in .wgetrc, thus taking precedence over them. I always wondered

(±¤°í)°üÀý¿°¿¡¼­ ÇعæµÈ ȯÈñÀÇ »ýÈ°(ÁֺΠ65¼¼ »ç¶ÇÀ¯¸®ÄÚ)

2002-04-10 Thread ±è±âÁß
±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß, http://www..com/ ¿¡¼­ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥ Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä ÂüÀ¸·Î ³î¶ó¿î ÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Àú´Â°£°æÈ­ 2±â ȯÀÚ¿´À¾´Ï´Ù. È­Àå½Ç °ÉÀ½¸¸Çصµ Èû¿¡