"Brent Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whats CVS and what is the significance of this version?
"CVS" stands for "Concurrent Versions System", and is the version
control system where the master sources for Wget are kept. I would
not advise the download of the "CVS" version because it is li
"James C. McMaster (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hrvoje Niksic said:
>> Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Right now, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is providing free relaying for spammers
>> > to all its subscribers.
>>
>> So does any mailing list with
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hrvoje Niksic said:
> Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Right now, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is providing free relaying for spammers
> > to all its subscribers.
>
> So does any mailing list with open subscription.
Any spammer *could* subscribe to an open-
Whats CVS and what is the significance of this version?
signed --Just a user
Brent Morgan
Oceaneering Space Systems
16665 Space Center Blvd
Houston TX 77058
(281) 228 5454 eFAX (419) 821-4826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/24/02 04:12AM >>>
Binary for current cvs
Marc Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are likely people interested in wget who aren't that
> interested in grepping the 80 or so freshmeat announcements per day,
> so I think that it would be generally useful myself.
I thought Freshmeat offered per-package announcements? Maybe I'v
>
> Marc Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>
> >> If you have a spam-fighting suggestion that does *not* include
> >> disallowing non-subscriber postings, I am more than willing to listen.
> >>
> >
> > It's not spam fighting, but I would personally like to see a
> > wget-announce mo
Marc Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> If you have a spam-fighting suggestion that does *not* include
>> disallowing non-subscriber postings, I am more than willing to listen.
>>
>
> It's not spam fighting, but I would personally like to see a
> wget-announce moderator-only list whe
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I respectfully disagree. If we can spend the time to read and
> answer the poster's question, the poster can spend five minutes
> to subscribe/unsubscribe.
>
> For reference, see the netiquette item on posting to newsgroups
> and asking for replies by
On 2002-01-29 22:02 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> But that was just an example. The actual reasoning for allowing
> non-subscriber posting boils down to three reasons:
>
> 1. I believe it is the right thing to do. I personally hate allegedly
>"supportive" mailing lists that require me to s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hrvoje Niksic said:
> "James C. McMaster (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Reinke said:
> >> Is anyone else not finding the noise ratio (i.e. spam) a bit high
> >> here? I sympathize with the effort required to lightly
Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Setting up a spam filter requires some effort on the part of the
> list master.
The list masters are running a number of spam filters which are
catching a significant number of spam messages. But apparently the
number of spams that do pass the filters
>
> If you have a spam-fighting suggestion that does *not* include
> disallowing non-subscriber postings, I am more than willing to listen.
>
It's not spam fighting, but I would personally like to see a wget-announce
moderator-only list where new releases and security announcements could be
p
"James C. McMaster (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Reinke said:
>> Is anyone else not finding the noise ratio (i.e. spam) a bit high
>> here? I sympathize with the effort required to lightly moderate,
>> but might I recommend that _something_ be done to
Title: Yalnýz Kalma...
Yalnýzlýktan sýkýldýnýz
mý?Hepimiz
zaman zaman bir dosta, bir sevgiliye ya da bir dert ortaðýna ihtiyaç duymuþuzdur
deðil mi ? Peki ya o dostun sizlere bir click ötede olduðunu söylersem ne dersiniz?
Þimdi sizlere b
On 29 Jan 2002 at 9:56, Alan Eldridge wrote:
> Recent discussion here makes it reasonable, I think, to evaluate what
> the "correct" behavior of -m is. I believe that, if -m is truly to do
> "mirroring", then its behavior does need to change.
Actually it does seem to work correctly unless you co
Hi there,
We wrote a Win32 download manager, called WackGet, that uses wget for Win32
to perform the downloads. The project page is here:
http://millweed.com/projects/wackget
Here's a screenshot:
http://millweed.com/cgi-bin/pic?shots/wackget.gif
Cheers!
Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í
Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀÛ³â ÇÑÇØ ÀÏÀÌ Á¦´ë·Î ¾ÊÇ®¸®¼Ì´øºÐ, ´ä´äÇÑ »ç¿¬ÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¼Ì´øºÐ!!
¿ª¼úÀΰú »ó´ãÇغ¸½Ê½Ã¿ä ºÐ¸í ´äÀÌ
ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
ÅäÁ¤ºñ°á, ¼Ó±ÃÇÕ °Ñ±ÃÇÕ, »ç¾÷¿î, ½ÂÁø¿î, ÁøÇпî, °Ç°¿î,
ÀÛ¸í, ÅÃÀÏ, º°ÀÚ¸®Á¡, dz¼öÁö¸®, ¾ÖÁ¤¿î, »ç¶û¿î
Hello,
I am not subscribed to this list, so please CC me on your answers.
I am having a hell of a time to get the reg-ex stuff to work with the -A or -R
options. If I supply this option to my wget command:
-R 1*
Everything works as expected. Same with this:
-R 2*
Now, if I do this:
-R 1*,2*
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:17:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I (client) don't get the choice. If the document at
>http://foo.bar/index.html has all its links like this:
>
>ftp://foo.bar/welcome.html";>welcome
>
>the client has no choice but to retrieve them via FTP.
>It would be nice if wg
On 29/01/2002 15:54:17 Andre Majorel wrote:
[snip debate about following links in HTML retrieved by FTP]
>
>I'm inclined to think that recursive retrieval without parsing
>is a feature. HTML content is normally served over HTTP. If you
>want to retrieve HTML through FTP, it's likely because you
Hi,
I have been happily using wget to handle automatic
ftp download but now have a situation which I am
not sure whether wget can handle.
This is the type of synax that I have been using without
any problems:
$ wget ftp://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/file.txt
Now I need to add the twist where use
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:54:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
>On 2002-01-29 09:56 -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
>
>> In particular, does wget parse and follow links in an HTML document,
>> when that document is retrieved (using -r) via the FTP protocol? If
>> not, why not?
>
>I'm inclined to think
On 2002-01-29 09:56 -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
> In particular, does wget parse and follow links in an HTML document,
> when that document is retrieved (using -r) via the FTP protocol? If
> not, why not?
>
> FTP presents an interesting case because because there are two
> independent concepts o
Recent discussion here makes it reasonable, I think, to evaluate what
the "correct" behavior of -m is. I believe that, if -m is truly to do
"mirroring", then its behavior does need to change.
Currently, -m is a shorthand for -r -N, but does not perform a mirror
operation in the traditional sense
This workaround won't solve the generic case, IMHO.
As far as I understand (unless I'm missing something obvious),
right now, when timestamping is on,
any children of a document which is decided to be already mirrored are never
mirrored. So, say, if there's a second generation document that is mi
On 29 Jan 2002 at 8:52, Herold Heiko wrote:
> In other words, you'd want to NOT do timestamping (-N or --timestamping,
> implicitely turned on by -m) for the first file but do it for later
> ones. I don't think you can do that currently with one invocation of
> wget.
You shouldn't have to do tha
Hi,
I'm new to wget. I use the following command
to get files from the site
wget ftp://ftp.iitm.ac.in/debian
and have set my .wgetrc file with the following
tries=20
reclevel=5
passive_ftp = on
http_proxy = http://anselm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:9000/
ftp_proxy= http://anselm:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:90
27 matches
Mail list logo
