Strong Stock Alert 251286543322221111

2002-01-31 Thread Strongtockalert251286
CBCom, Inc. (OTCBB : CBCI) Immediate Strong BUY Recommendation Huge Analyst and Newsletter Coverage for CBCI CBCI will be profiled by some major analysts and newsletters along with the release of significant news regarding explosive sales for the Company. There will be

Downloading all files by http:

2002-01-31 Thread Fred Holmes
wget win32 binary Downloading a single file works just fine, as follows wget -N http://www.karenware.com/progs/ptreplicator-setup.exe but wget -N http://www.karenware.com/progs/*.* fails with a not found whether the filespec is * or *.* The * syntax works just fine with ftp Is there a

Re: Downloading all files by http:

2002-01-31 Thread Ian Abbott
On 31 Jan 2002 at 9:25, Fred Holmes wrote: wget -N http://www.karenware.com/progs/*.* fails with a not found whether the filespec is * or *.* The * syntax works just fine with ftp Is there a syntax that will get all files with http? You could try wget -m -l 1 -n

timestamping content-length --ignore-length

2002-01-31 Thread Bruce BrackBill
Hi, If I understand timestamping corretly, wget will look at the content-length header and if the length is different than the local copy , wget will reget the web page even if the the remote file is older/same_as the local copy. The problem is, that my web pages are served up by php and the

Re: timestamping content-length --ignore-length

2002-01-31 Thread Ian Abbott
On 31 Jan 2002 at 8:41, Bruce BrackBill wrote: The problem is, that my web pages are served up by php and the content lengh is not defined. So as the manual states I use --ignore-length. But when wget retrieves an image it slows right down, possibly because it is ignoring the

Re: timestamping content-length --ignore-length

2002-01-31 Thread Bruce BrackBill
From: Ian Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Bruce BrackBill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: timestamping content-length --ignore-length Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:24:11 - On 31 Jan 2002 at 8:41, Bruce BrackBill wrote: The problem is, that my web pages are served up by php

Re: timestamping content-length --ignore-length

2002-01-31 Thread Ian Abbott
On 31 Jan 2002 at 9:48, Bruce BrackBill wrote: Thanks for your responce Ian. When I use it without --ignore-length option it appears that wget SOMETIMES ignores the last_modified_date OR wget says to itself ( hey, I see the file is older than the local copy, but hey, since the server isn't

how are you

2002-01-31 Thread
Below is the details filled out on the website. It was submitted by ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 21:08:10 --- : Hey there! I'm a 19/f/Florida. Would you like to see PORN AND LIVE VIDEOS FOR

Re: Spam

2002-01-31 Thread Johnnie J. Young
Can whoever is in charge of this list please set it up so people have to join the list to post to it. This spam is getting ridiculous and if we are going to continue to receive all of these porn solicitations, etc., I am going to have to unsubscribe. Johnnie On 31 Jan 2002 at 21:08, [EMAIL

Re: Spam

2002-01-31 Thread Samuel Hargis
Johnnie, Some of us may enjoy a little free porn. Just Kidding ; ) Sam Johnnie J. Young wrote: Can whoever is in charge of this list please set it up so people have to join the list to post to it. This spam is getting ridiculous and if we are going to continue to receive all of these

Re: Dynamic Images

2002-01-31 Thread Hack Kampbjørn
RUI SHANTILAL wrote: Don´t know if you can consider it as a bug but reality is that I couldn´t retrieve images that are generated through a script. Example is : http://www.portugaldiario.iol.pt/idpd92.html try to retrieve all this page including all the images and all the images

Re: bug when processing META tag.

2002-01-31 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
An, Young Hun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: if HTML document contains code like this meta http-equiv=Refresh wget may be crushed. It has 'refresh' but does not have 'content'. Of course this is incorrect HTML. But I found some pages at web :) simply add check routine at 'tag_handle_meta'

Re: timestamping content-length --ignore-length

2002-01-31 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Ian Abbott wrote: The problem is, that my web pages are served up by php and the content lengh is not defined. So as the manual states I use --ignore-length. But when wget retrieves an image it slows right down, possibly because it is ignoring the content-length.