Re: wget -m imply -np?

2002-12-30 Thread Karl Berry
using -m as a trouble-free no-brainer will get you the complete site neatly done with timestamps. But then you're saying wget -m http://example.org in the first place. If you say wget -m http://example.org/some/deep/sub/directory, then my experience is that the last thing one wants is to

Re: wget -m imply -np?

2002-12-30 Thread Jens Rösner
Hi Karl! >From my POV, the current set-up is the best solution. Of course, I am also no developer, but an avid user. Sometimes you just don't know the structure of the website in advance, so using -m as a trouble-free no-brainer will get you the complete site neatly done with timestamps. BTW, -

wget -m imply -np?

2002-12-30 Thread Karl Berry
I wonder if it would make sense for wget -m (--mirror) to imply -np (--no-parent). I know that I, at least, have no interest in ever mirroring anything "above" the target url(s) -- generally, that leads to the whole Internet. An option to explicitly include the parents could be added. Just a sug