Re: Does AI_ADDRCONFIG really work?

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: there is another possible solution. reordering the addresses returned by getaddrinfo so that IPv4 addresses are at the beginning of the list. Will that cause problems in some setups? I thought there was an RFC that mandated that the order of records

Re: too many users

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Leonid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, wget 1.9.1 consideres failure to connect as a fatal error and abandoned to re-try attempts. I have submitted several times a patch for fixing this and similar problems. Presumably, it will be inlcuded in the future wget 1.11 . If yoy need the fix now, you

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i totally agree with hrvoje here. in the worst case, we can add an entry in the FAQ explaining how to compile wget with those buggy versions of microsoft cc. Umm. What FAQ? :-)

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses and -4/-6 switches

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, to defend myself, i have to say that nc6 handles the -4 and -6 switches by simply setting the ai_family member of the hints struct to be passed to getaddrinfo to PF_INET6 and PF_INET respectively, instead of the PF_UNSPEC default. so, the

RE: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Herold Heiko
is dropped in the windows/Readme either they will read it, or they will stall due to OpenSSL dependencies (on by default) anyway. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax 20050420.winreadme.diff

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From my impressions of the Windows world, non-developers won't touch source code anyway -- they will simply use the binary. I feel I must dissent. I am greatly surprised. Do you really believe that Windows users outside an academic environment are

Re: Does AI_ADDRCONFIG really work?

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:47 am, you wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: there is another possible solution. reordering the addresses returned by getaddrinfo so that IPv4 addresses are at the beginning of the list. Will that cause problems in some setups? on IPv6-only

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:58 am, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i totally agree with hrvoje here. in the worst case, we can add an entry in the FAQ explaining how to compile wget with those buggy versions of microsoft cc. Umm. What FAQ? :-) the

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses and -4/-6 switches

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:12 am, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: well, to defend myself, i have to say that nc6 handles the -4 and -6 switches by simply setting the ai_family member of the hints struct to be passed to getaddrinfo to PF_INET6 and PF_INET

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:55 am, Herold Heiko wrote: (sorry for the late answer, three days of 16+ hours/day migration aren't fun, UPS battery exploding inside the UPS almost in my face even less) -Original Message- From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Herold Heiko

Re: [Feature request] accept/reject path expresion

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 12:38 am, Oliver Schulze L. wrote: Hi, it would be nice if you could tell wget not to download a file if the URL matches some pattern. The pattern could be shell like or a regular expresion. For example, if you do a mirror of a ftp site, and you don't want to

wget 1.9.1 -- 2 GB limit -- negative filesize

2005-04-20 Thread Alexander Elgert
Greetings, I tried to get the wikipedia DVD image from ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/wikipedia.de/wp_1_2005.iso and there is a problem with the size handling in wget. Filesystem is ext3 and does definitively support files greater than 2GB. wget justs abort at 2GB-1 Byte and declares

Re: [Feature request] accept/reject path expresion

2005-04-20 Thread Oliver Schulze L.
Excelent news! Thanks Mauro, will be waiting ;) Oliver Mauro Tortonesi wrote: On Wednesday 20 April 2005 12:38 am, Oliver Schulze L. wrote: Hi, it would be nice if you could tell wget not to download a file if the URL matches some pattern. The pattern could be shell like or a regular expresion.

Re: wget 1.9.1 -- 2 GB limit -- negative filesize

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
hi alexander, this is a known problem which is already fixed in cvs. perhaps you may want to try using wget 1.10-alpha2: ftp://ftp.deepspace6.net/pub/ds6/sources/wget/wget-1.10-alpha2.tar.gz ftp://ftp.deepspace6.net/pub/ds6/sources/wget/wget-1.10-alpha2.tar.bz2 -- Aequam memento rebus in

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:58 am, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i totally agree with hrvoje here. in the worst case, we can add an entry in the FAQ explaining how to compile wget with those buggy versions of

Re: IPv4 mapped addresses and -4/-6 switches

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sorry, i forgot to tell you that when the -6 switch is used, nc6 also sets the IPV6_V6ONLY option for the PF_INET6 socket used in the communication. that's why IPv4-compatible addresses are rejected. Should Wget do the same? It seems to make sense to

Re: cygwin wget ssl

2005-04-20 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
[ Cc'ing the Wget mailing list ] Konrad Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I was wondering if you could provide some assistance on how to resolve this problem. wget using SSL works except for this site. Any reason why and how to resolve? It seems this site is sending something that the

Re: wget 1.10 alpha 2

2005-04-20 Thread Mauro Tortonesi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 02:42 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wednesday 20 April 2005 04:58 am, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i totally agree with hrvoje here. in the worst case, we can add an entry in the FAQ