Re: wget 1.10 release candidate 1
Hi Jochen, yes, I readed it. Thats why I suggested using an option to ./configure in order to enabled it. And, it should be disabled by default. Its a nice options for all, because, if you don't have pcre, you won't receive any warning and it won't hurt nobody. HTH Oliver Jochen Roderburg wrote: Zitat von "Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Neither, rc1 or alpha2 have prce patch included. I think that prce is a very usefull patch, and it should be added to CVS and not enabled by default in the ./configure script. So, if you want to use prce, just ./configure --with-prce and everybody is happy. Hmmm, you mean everybody who has "prce" is happy? Did you not read the message that I pointed you to ;-) ?? It said that the developers do not want to include a regex patch in wget until they find a solution that is portable enough to all systems that wget is supposed to run on. And no, I'm not involved in this, just wanted to remind that this has been discussed already a few times on the list ;-) J.Roderburg -- Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: wget 1.10 release candidate 1
Zitat von "Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Neither, rc1 or alpha2 have prce patch included. > I think that prce is a very usefull patch, and it should be > added to CVS and not enabled by default in the ./configure script. > So, if you want to use prce, just ./configure --with-prce > and everybody is happy. Hmmm, you mean everybody who has "prce" is happy? Did you not read the message that I pointed you to ;-) ?? It said that the developers do not want to include a regex patch in wget until they find a solution that is portable enough to all systems that wget is supposed to run on. And no, I'm not involved in this, just wanted to remind that this has been discussed already a few times on the list ;-) J.Roderburg
Re: wget 1.10 release candidate 1
Hi, Neither, rc1 or alpha2 have prce patch included. I think that prce is a very usefull patch, and it should be added to CVS and not enabled by default in the ./configure script. So, if you want to use prce, just ./configure --with-prce and everybody is happy. Just my 2c Oliver Jochen Roderburg wrote: Zitat von "Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Mauro, do you know if the regex patch from Tobias was applied to this release? Thanks Oliver The last words on this topic that I remember were here: http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg07436.html Regards, J.Roderburg -- Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: wget and ASCII mode
From: Kiran Atlluri > [...] > I am trying to retrieve a ?.csv? file on a unix system using wget (ftp > mode).I > > When I retrieve a file using normal FTP and specify ASCII mode, I > successfully get the file and there are no ? ^ M ? at the end of line in > this file. > > But when I use wget all the lines in the file have this ? ^M ? at the > end. > [...] This happens because write_data() (in "src/retr.c") does nothing to adjust the FTP-standard CR-LF line endings according to the local standard (in this case, LF-only), which a proper FTP client should do. A fix for this was included among my recent (well, not _very_ recent now) VMS-related patch submissions, but it would probably be a mistake to hold your breath waiting for those changes to be incorporated into the main code stream. If you're desperate to see what I did to fix this, you could visit: http://antinode.org/ftp/wget/patch1/ ftp://antinode.org/wget/patch1/ A quick search for the (new) enum value "rb_ftp_ascii" suggests that the relevant changes are in "ftp.c", "retr.c", and "retr.h". Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions about what you find there. (The new code does make one potentially risky assumption, but it's explained in the comments.) Steven M. Schweda (+1) 651-699-9818 382 South Warwick Street[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saint Paul MN 55105-2547
Re: wget 1.10 release candidate 1
Thanks Jochen, I'm downloading both now Oliver Jochen Roderburg wrote: Zitat von "Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Mauro, do you know if the regex patch from Tobias was applied to this release? Thanks Oliver The last words on this topic that I remember were here: http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg07436.html Regards, J.Roderburg -- Oliver Schulze L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: wget 1.10 release candidate 1
Zitat von "Oliver Schulze L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Mauro, > do you know if the regex patch from Tobias was applied to this release? > > Thanks > Oliver > The last words on this topic that I remember were here: http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg07436.html Regards, J.Roderburg
