Re: Wget retrieve to a pipe ?

On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 07:49:13PM -0800, Peter Skye wrote: > I am using wget 1.9.1 on OS/2 and want to retrieve a web page to a pipe > instead of a named file. In other words, I want to do the following > ("-q" is quiet mode): > >wget -q http://www.server.com/index.html | find /i "Title" >

Building WGET on OS/2

Has anyone on the list ever built WGET on OS/2? I know there already are OS/2 ports of WGET available, but I'd like to build it for my own environment. I've done this in the past but can't remember exactly what steps I went through or which version. -- John

Problem building WGET

When I attempt to build WGET, configure stops with the error msg:- cannot open /po/POTFILES.in: No such file or directory It looks as though srcdir is getting set to NULL. Why should that happen? -- John

Using wildcards through proxy server

Can anyone confirm that WGET allows the use of wildcards trhough a proxy server? It doesn't seem to work here. -- John

Using wildcards through a proxy server

Should the use of wildcards work when running through a proxy server? I spent ages trying to get something like this working:- wget ftp://abc.org/pub/*.zip only to find that it works fine when directly connected to the internet, but not via a proxy. Retrieving individual files works OK thou

Re: Wget 1.8-beta1 now available

On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it possible to include OBJEXT in Makefile.in to make this more > > cross-platform? > > I suppose so. I mean, o is already defined to .@U@o, but I&#

Re: Wget 1.8-beta1 now available

On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 04:20:56AM +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Here is a beta version of what is to be 1.8. In this case, "beta" > does not mean instability, just that I'd like a wider audience to take > a look at the thing before we can call it a "prerelease". In either > case, I'm aiming for

WGET 1.7.1 on OS/2

I've just managed to build WGET 1.7.1 on OS/2 by changing src/Makefile:- o = .o to o = .obj then running Autoconf, configure and Make. Maybe Makefile.in needs to be changed so that it includes OBJEXT... I'm not very familiar with Makefile.in, but could the appropriate change be made so th

Re: WGET 1.7.1 for OS/2

On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:28:33AM +, John Poltorak wrote: > > Has anyone succeeded building Wget v1.7.1 on OS/2? I've just managed to build it now after amending src/Makefile by changing:- o = .o to o = .obj Maybe Makefile.in needs to be changed so that it includes OBJEXT.

WGET 1.7.1 for OS/2

Has anyone succeeded building Wget v1.7.1 on OS/2? -- John

Building WGET

I tried building the the standard WGET v1.7 on OS/2 using Autoconf (2.50), Configure and Make but ended up with this error:- checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... no checking for ld used by GCC... C:/EMX/BIN/ld.exe checking if the linker (C:

Re: Wget 1.7-pre1 available for testing

On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:35:40PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > The pre-release of Wget is now available for testing. Please download > it and see if it conforms to standards, expectations, if it compiles > out of the box, etc. > > The pre-release is available at: > > ftp://gnjilux.srk.fer

Retreiving directory tree without files

Is there any way to make WGET mirror a directory tree but excludes files? -- John

Re: Wget

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:28:04AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm confused. I thought 1.5.3 *did* display the dots, but I could be wrong. It does here:- 1600K -> .. .. .. .. .. [ 95%] 1650K -> .. .. .. .. ..

Makefile.in

Can someone tell me where src/Makefile.in comes from? Is it generated by AUTOMAKE by any chance? I'm trying to compile WGET 1.6 for OS/2 and it looks as though this line:- exeext = @exeext@ is preventing the compiler from using the correct flags. If this line was changed to:- exeext =