On 9/15/06, Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
reliable detection of changes in the resource to be downloaded would be
a very interesting feature. but do you really think that checking the
last X (< 100) bytes would be enough to be reasonably sure the resource
was (not) modified? what abo
John McCabe-Dansted ha scritto:
"Wget has no way of verifying that the local file is
really a valid prefix of the remote file"
Couldn't wget redownload the last 4 bytes (or so) of the file?
For a few bytes per file we could detect changes to almost all
compressed files and the majorit
"Wget has no way of verifying that the local file is
really a valid prefix of the remote file"
Couldn't wget redownload the last 4 bytes (or so) of the file?
For a few bytes per file we could detect changes to almost all
compressed files and the majority of uncompressed files.
--
John
