On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Speaking of testing, please be sure to test the latest CVS on Windows as
well, where MSG_PEEK is said to be flaky. HTTPS is another thing that might
work strangely because SSL_peek is undocumented (!).
Out of curiosity, why are you introducing
Daniel Stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out of curiosity, why are you introducing this peeking? I mean,
what's the gain?
Simplifying the code. Getting rid of the unfinished and undocumented
rbuf abstraction layer. Buffering is unnecessary when downloading
the body, and is mostly
Does anyone know whether the MSG_PEEK flag can be relied upon? I'd
like to use peeking to get rid of the ad hoc rbuf layer used in Wget
since time immemorial.
Peeking would require additional work under SSL, but I think I know
how to make it work. But I'm more worried about TCP/IP stacks
