Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Thanks for the patch, I've now applied it to CVS.
You might want to add a comment in front of fake_fork() explaining
what it does, and why. The comment doesn't have to be long, only
several sentences so that someone reading the code later understands
what the heck a "fake for
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Thanks for the patch, I've now applied it to CVS.
You might want to add a comment in front of fake_fork() explaining
what it does, and why. The comment doesn't have to be long, only
several sentences so that someone reading the code later understands
what the heck a "fake for
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
For now I'd start with applying David's patch, so that people can test
its functionality. It is easy to fix the behavior of `wget -q -b'
later.
David, can I apply your patch now?
Sure.
The attached patch corrects a few minor formatting details but is otherwise
identical to t
> From: David Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] A working implementation of fork_to_background()
> The current patch attempts to emulate the behavior of the
> Unix version. AFAICT,
> this and the following suggestion apply equally well to the
> existing (Unix) code.
I ag
Herold Heiko wrote:
MSVC binary at http://xoomer.virgilio.it/hherold/ for public testing.
I performed only basic tests on NT4 sp6a, everything performed fine as
expected.
Thank you much for testing and hosting the binary.
Some ideas on this thing:
I'll respond to your points out-of-order.
In verb
MSVC binary at http://xoomer.virgilio.it/hherold/ for public testing.
I performed only basic tests on NT4 sp6a, everything performed fine as
expected.
Some ideas on this thing:
In verbose mode the child should probably acknowledge in the log file the
fact it was invocated as child.
In debug mode
