Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-07-03 Thread Alain Bench
On Saturday, July 2, 2005 at 12:38:24 PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: print numbers according to the locale. Much thanks, Hrvoje! [full size] doesn't use the separators Copy/pastability won over readability: Fine. You exposed the problem, heard other's arguments, and took a

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-07-02 Thread Alain Bench
Hello Tony, On Friday, June 24, 2005 at 11:57:22 AM -0700, Tony Lewis wrote: Hrvoje Niksic wrote: application that accepts numbers as Wget prints them. Microsoft Calculator does. Not here. This seems to be locale dependant, requiring exact localized input. Here MS Calculator accepts

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-07-02 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not here. This seems to be locale dependant, requiring exact localized input. Here MS Calculator accepts pasted 123 456 789,01 as correct 123456789.01, but when pasted wget's English 123,456,789.01 it fails, interpreting this as 123.456789 and beeping.

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-25 Thread Alain Bench
On Friday, June 24, 2005 at 6:45:44 PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: input for other applications, which is very hard with the thousand separators. Pasting is very hard, parsing is not. An app running wget can easely parse it's output, whatever it is. If not directly then thru a wrapper.

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-25 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Removing separators will break existing apps parsing wget's output. Such apps exist? They do exist, but *any* change in Wget's output will break them. Since they probably do the equivalent of sed s/,//g anyway, the removal of separators is likely to be the

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Alain Bench
On Thursday, June 23, 2005 at 3:16:28 PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Since Wget 1.10 also prints sizes in kilobytes/megabytes/etc., I am thinking of removing the thousand separators from size display. IMHO thousand (or myriad) separators are necessary. This size display is primarily

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday, June 23, 2005 at 3:16:28 PM +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Since Wget 1.10 also prints sizes in kilobytes/megabytes/etc., I am thinking of removing the thousand separators from size display. IMHO thousand (or myriad) separators are

RE: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Leonid
Hrvoje, What do you think? To add a new (oh!) option in .wgetrc and call it decimal_separator Those guys who find numbers like 11782023180 easy to read and can tell for a fraction of a second that it was 11Gb downloaded, not 1.1Gb, will use decimal_separator = I personally would

RE: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Tony Lewis
Hrvoje Niksic wrote: In fact, I know of no application that accepts numbers as Wget prints them. Microsoft Calculator does. Tony

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Leonid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Those guys who find numbers like 11782023180 easy to read and can tell for a fraction of a second that it was 11Gb I'm not such person; Wget would in fact print: Length: 11782023180 (11.0G)

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-24 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje Niksic wrote: In fact, I know of no application that accepts numbers as Wget prints them. Microsoft Calculator does. Sorry, I forgot to qualify that as (Unix) command-line application or something to that effect. I know that many GUI

Re: Removing thousand separators from file size output

2005-06-23 Thread manoj
In Hindi (India - applies to probably other Indian languages too), it is every 2 digits AFTER thousand: E.g., 10,00,000 (Hindi) rather than 1,000,000. This is because of way numbers are spelled in language. There is a unique word for thousand. Then new words occur for numbers every multiple