By the way, can you please clarify the intention behind AI_V4MAPPED
and AI_ALL, which configure tests for, but nothing uses?
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Maybe we should concentrate on the contents rather than style. :-)
you're right ;-)
i would also suggest renaming configure.in to configure.ac...
Sure. I've never understood the conceptual difference between the two
anyway. I'm already using
hi to hrvoje and all, i am still alive ;-) and i am finally catching up
with the changes you've done at wget ipv6 code. from what i've seen so
far, it seems that you've done a great job (especially on lookup_host and
resolve_bind_address and on the transport_map)!!!
only a few suggestions
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi to hrvoje and all, i am still alive ;-) and i am finally catching
up with the changes you've done at wget ipv6 code. from what i've
seen so far, it seems that you've done a great job (especially on
lookup_host and resolve_bind_address
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still don't understand the choice to use sockaddr and
sockaddr_storage in a application code.
They result in needless casts and (to me) uncomprehensible code.
well, using sockaddr_storage is the right
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and i'm saying that for this task the ideal structure is
sockaddr_storage. notice that my code uses sockaddr_storage
(typedef'd as wget_sockaddr) only when dealing with socket
addresses, not for ip address caching.
Now I see. Thanks for clearing it
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An IPv4 address is nothing more than a 32-bit quantity. I don't
see anything incorrect about using unsigned char[4] for that, and
that works perfectly fine on 64-bit architectures.
ok, but in this way
with Linux http://www.deepspace6.net
Ferrara Linux User Grouphttp://www.ferrara.linux.it
wget-ipv6.diff.bz2
Description: Binary data
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, i am asking you: what do you think of these changes?
Overall they look very good! Judging from the patch, a large piece of
the work part seems to be in an unexpected place: the FTP code.
Here are some remarks I got looking at the patch.
It
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, i am asking you: what do you think of these changes?
Overall they look very good! Judging from the patch, a large piece of
the work part seems to be in an unexpected place: the FTP code.
yes, i have
Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still don't understand the choice to use sockaddr and
sockaddr_storage in a application code.
They result in needless casts and (to me) uncomprehensible code.
well, using sockaddr_storage is the right way (TM) to write IPv6 enabled
code ;-)
Not
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
are there __REALLY__ systems which do not support inet_aton? their ISVs
should be ashamed of themselves...
Solaris, for example. IIRC inet_aton isn't in any document which claims
to be a standard.
however, yours seemed to me an ugly hack, so i have temporarily removed
Thomas Lussnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. without IPv6 there is no longer used new syscalls
(gethostbyname2,inet_ntop,inet_pton)
2. It can on runtime downgreade to IPv4
3. In IPv6 mode it can handle IPv4 Adresses
4. Checked with following input www.ix.de , 217.110.115.160 ,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
So we can just ignore the scope? I hope you are right -- I certainly don't
know enough about this to judge for myself.
The so called scope in IPv6 is emeddeded in the address, so you can't use
IPv6 addresses without getting the scope too.
Most nodes
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The so called scope in IPv6 is emeddeded in the address, so you can't use
IPv6 addresses without getting the scope too.
Are you sure? Here is what itojun said in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
due to the IPv6 address architecture (scoped), 16 bytes
Daniel Stenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The so called scope in IPv6 is emeddeded in the address, so you can't use
IPv6 addresses without getting the scope too.
Are you sure? Here is what itojun said in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
due to the
Hi,
i worked on it :-)
The good thing is http works not with IPv4 and IPv6 sites if commpiled
with IPv6.
3 things have to be done now:
1. make command line siwtch to change the default 4/6
2. if IPv6 enabled and IPv4 address found make an IPv6 address from whem
( clean caching )
3. Make the
17 matches
Mail list logo
