Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From the feedback I got since 1998 (the first version of [Wget New
> Percentage]) I can tell that nobody complained about false or
> strange ETA.
Comparing the progress bar with WNP is not entirely correct because
WNP was based on
Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but it seems to me ETA is calculated using the whole current time
> elapsed since start of download.
That's how it's done, yes.
> Wouldn't it be more "correct" to calculate ETA using the download
> rate of the last couple (or some more ?) of buffers wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073
-- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087
-- ITALY
> -Original Message-
> From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:45 AM
> To: Wget List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On windows appareantly with beta2 and previous at least on nt4 a
> screen size of 81 is needed in order to print the progress bar
> correctly ?
Oh. Windows probably doesn't like the fact that Wget attempts to use
the full 80 characters. On most Unix t
On windows appareantly with beta2 and previous at least on nt4 a screen
size of 81 is needed in order to print the progress bar correctly ?
(beside the fact different window sizes are not detected correctly)
I'll try to look into it today, just thought I'd send a note in the
meantime
Heiko
--
-
