Hi
I would like to know if there is a reason for using a signed int for
the length of the files to download. The thing is that I was trying to
download a 2.3 GB file using wget, but then the length was printed as
a negative number and wget said Aborted. Is it a bug or a design
decision?
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:19:50 -0400, Cristián Serpell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I would like to know if there is a reason for using a signed int for
the length of the files to download. The thing is that I was trying
to download a 2.3 GB file using wget, but then the length was printed
as a negative
Cristián Serpell wrote:
I would like to know if there is a reason for using a signed int for
the length of the files to download.
I would like to know why people still complain about bugs that were fixed
three years ago. (More accurately, it was a design flaw that originated from
a time when
It is the latest Ubuntu's distribution, that still comes with the old
version.
Thanks anyway, that was the problem.
El 16-09-2008, a las 15:08, Tony Lewis escribió:
Cristián Serpell wrote:
I would like to know if there is a reason for using a signed int for
the length of the files to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cristián Serpell wrote:
It is the latest Ubuntu's distribution, that still comes with the old
version.
Thanks anyway, that was the problem.
I know that's untrue. Ubuntu comes with 1.10.2 at least, and has for
quite some time. If you're using
Maybe I should have started by this (I had to change the name of the
file shown):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# wget --version
GNU Wget 1.10.2
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the
Cristián Serpell wrote:
Maybe I should have started by this (I had to change the name of the
file shown):
[snip]
---response begin---
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:37:46 GMT
Server: Apache
Last-Modified: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:17:51 GMT
ETag: 7f710a-8a8e1bf7-47fbd2ef