On 26 Dec 2005 at 15:15, Ian Hickson wrote:
(I didn't cc the list because you didn't; feel free to reply to the list
if you want.)
An omission I think I realised a little later and sent a separate
copy to the list. Sorry to mess up threading for all of you.. (And I
really prefer
Sorry to be slow at responding, Christmas and all that..
Here's what I thought: a new attribute sandbox (or securitypolicy,
name doesn't matter much) might tell the UA something about what the
script can do:
script src=... sandbox=writeonly
script src=... sandbox=none
1. The entire
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:18:52 +0600, Hallvord R M Steen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to be slow at responding, Christmas and all that..
Merry Christmas and happy New Year to you!
1. The entire thing has to degrade SAFELY in existing browsers.
I'm not absolutely sure this is a
