James Graham wrote:
Also I would be surprised if there weren't multiple
implementations of getElementsByClassname floating around in javascript
libraries. So you can't really call it unimplemented.
While there are many JavaScript implementations (I even wrote one myself
a few months ago), all
Jim Ley wrote:
On 2/4/06, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reasons why XBL is not currently an acceptable substitute are
numerous, including its extremely limited implementation,
So something with no implementation should be taken over something
with an existing implementation, that's
On 2/4/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One issue with a Selector method though, how do we handle namespace
> prefixes? Selectors states that the mechanism for declaring a namespace
> prefix is left up to the language implementing Selectors. If we say the
> script uses the same pref
Jim Ley wrote:
...neither is it apparent that a classname specific shortname is
worthwhile when a CSSSelector one would be more appropriate.
It should be called getElementsBySelector, rather than CSSSelector,
because selectors is not specific to CSS (it's not even called "CSS
Selectors" any m
On 2/4/06, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fully admit the possibility that this may be better accomplished
> with some other theoretical and/or vendor-specific technology, but you
> again missed the core point.
the core point is we're inventing something new to meet a use case,
you inve
On 2/4/06, Jim Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/06, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't believe that you're so insistent upon this extremely narrow
> > set of use cases and that there aren't any other popular use cases for
> > getElementsByClassName().
>
> It's the only one tha
Le 2006-02-03 à 19:20, Simon Pieters a écrit :
I have a some markup like this:
Tab 1
Tab 2
...
...
With the help of a style sheet, the script transforms this into
some sort of tab view. It search for each div of class "pane". I
On 2/4/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Ley wrote:
> For example, if an author
> marked up dates in their document like this (due to the lack of a date
> element)
>
> 2006-02-03T01:30Z
A nice use case, and one well met by XBL including the currently
implemented -moz-binding, met m
On 2/4/06, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't believe that you're so insistent upon this extremely narrow
> set of use cases and that there aren't any other popular use cases for
> getElementsByClassName().
It's the only one that's ever been voiced without the extreme
prompting now ge
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:49:23 +0200, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/3/06, Jim Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<...>
I can't believe that you're so insistent upon this extremely narrow
set of use cases and that there aren't any other popular use cases for
getElementsByClassName().
I
* Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Well, if you approach the problem by asking whether it's possible that
>> things become non-compliant, you'll either have to analyze any and all
>> dependencies like server-side scripts and workflows or you'd generate
>> false negatives, since adding some external data to
11 matches
Mail list logo