Re: [whatwg] The problem of duplicate ID as a security issue

2006-03-17 Thread Anne van Kesteren
Quoting Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm not sure that the answers to these questions are the same for all modern browsers. You can speculate forever or just find out. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: [whatwg] The problem of duplicate ID as a security issue

2006-03-17 Thread Mihai Sucan
Le Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:53:00 +0200, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Quoting Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm not sure that the answers to these questions are the same for all modern browsers. You can speculate forever or just find out. My small test page does some

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-17 Thread Jim Ley
On 3/16/06, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallvord R M Steen wrote: You are right, if no variables are created one can't see the data by loading it in a SCRIPT tag. Are you aware of intranets/CMSes that use this as a security mechanism? That's not actually right. I'm pretty

[whatwg] Comments and questions on Web Apps 1.0

2006-03-17 Thread Henri Sivonen
Based on the 2006-02-24 version. 1.1. Mac OS X not MacOS X 2.2.5. 'Should textContent be defined differently for dir= and bdo? Should we come up with an alternative to textContent that handles those and other things, like alt=?' Messing with the Core API seems like a bad idea. Having an

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-17 Thread Jim Ley
On 3/17/06, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Ley wrote: Please can you provide more information on how raw JSON is available from script elements? Apologies; it was the Array constructor, and I was slightly wrong in the details. Here is the exploit:

Re: [whatwg] Comments and questions on Web Apps 1.0

2006-03-17 Thread fantasai
Henri Sivonen wrote: 2.4.5. To set metadata with meta elements, authors must first specify a profile that defines metadata names, using the profile attribute. In my opinion, it would be useful to predefine the traditional names and Dublin Core. Predefining the traditional names would be

[whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Crockford
The JSONRequest does only one thing: It exchanges data between scripts on pages with JSON servers in the web. It provides this highly valuable service while introducing no new security vulnerabilities. A browser within a filewall may have the capability to interact with a server

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-17 Thread Douglas Crockford
The cache rules are unworkable, please remove these and use standard HTTP methods for suggesting the cacheability of a resource, forcing them to be uncacheable is unworkable w.r.t. to proxy caches and extremely unwelcome within the browser. Applications must not cache responses to a POST

Re: [whatwg] JSONRequest

2006-03-17 Thread Jim Ley
On 3/17/06, Douglas Crockford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The cache rules are unworkable, please remove these and use standard HTTP methods for suggesting the cacheability of a resource, forcing them to be uncacheable is unworkable w.r.t. to proxy caches and extremely unwelcome within the