Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5

2006-06-16 Thread juanrgonzaleza
Anne van Kesteren wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since MathML does not fit into the WHATWG philosophy, I would aknowledge information about your own solution to the problem of mathematical markup on the web. Oh please, cut the crap. Did you miss the message from Ian saying how it could

Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5

2006-06-16 Thread White Lynx
Since MathML does not fit into the WHATWG philosophy, I would aknowledge information about your own solution to the problem of mathematical markup on the web. Oh please, cut the crap. Did you miss the message from Ian saying how it could integrate? If by integrate you mean

Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5

2006-06-16 Thread James Graham
White Lynx wrote: So how does it fit in the scope of fundamental principles upon which the WHAT working group intends to operate? http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/papers/opera.html I don't see anything contradictory there (and in any case I'm not sure the document you

Re: [whatwg] Mathematics in HTML5

2006-06-16 Thread Michel Fortin
Le 16 juin 2006 à 9:27, White Lynx a écrit : Yes, sub/sup will behave like HTML sub/sup with offsets being based on font size like it is currently done in HTML implementations, while llim/ulim and marker/submark will have offsets based on size of their base (operator, fence, matrix etc.)

Re: [whatwg] On accessibility

2006-06-16 Thread Michel Fortin
Le 14 juin 2006 à 21:09, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : If implementations can be modified so that accesskeys do not interfere with existing shortcut keys, then that's great. Perhaps they could offer a kind of web-apps mode where all Alt+[key] combinations are safe to be used by the web page,