On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:22:58 +0200, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this proposal is definitely worth considering. Would it have
any ill effects on scripting compatibility with Appendix C XHTML soup
served as text/html? In cases like the DOM
would not be exactly the same as
At 11:45 -0400 UTC, on 2006-10-26, David Walbert wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
[...]
[axis]
>> I think it should be dropped due to lack of implementations and use
>> after being in HTML 4 for years.
You'd better first find out the cause of that lack of implementati
dolphinling wrote:
What if the canvas and span are surrounded by something with
font-weight:bold? Will the text in the canvas be drawn bold, too?
It's the responsibility of the page designer to make sure the text they
are measuring is styled the same as the text they want the metrics of.
Acc
On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
It might be interesting to have some sort of testing with the "axis"
attribute too, or maybe we should drop it.
I think it should be dropped due to lack of implementations and use
after being in HTML 4 for years.
It strikes me that the axi
I think mixing CSS and Canvas is a bad idea.
You could develop an application which would implement the canvas APi, and
be easily programed with ecmascript or java.
Adding this kind of feature would force the implementor to support CSS
too, at least partially.
Stefan Haustein <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Oct 23, 2006, at 21:31, Ian Hickson wrote:
I think it would be good to require table integrity. Specifically I
think
overlapping cells would be a MUST NOT.
Excellent! Thanks!
It might be interesting to have some sort of testing with the "axis"
attribute too, or maybe we should drop it.
On Oct 24, 2006, at 09:39, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:52:44 +0200, Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think this proposal is definitely worth considering. Would it
have any ill effects on scripting compatibility with Appendix C
XHTML soup served as text/html? In
