Leons, you forgot to CC the list.
Leons Petrazickis wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
m is for highlighting text that is of some interest to the reader, but
it does not alter the meaning of the text itself.
Would you say that em is semantic and m is presentational, with
the difference from span
On concern that we would be 'wasting' such a short element name for
such an esoteric usage, why not call it mark instead?
- Nicholas.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Feb 7, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
On concern that we would be 'wasting' such a short element name for
such an esoteric usage, why not call it mark instead?
I agree, I think the spec should be hesitant to introduce additional
single-letter element names.
Regards,
Maciej
--- Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leons, you forgot to CC the list.
Leons Petrazickis wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
m is for highlighting text that is of some interest to the reader, but
it does not alter the meaning of the text itself.
Would you say that em is semantic and
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:21:49 +0530, Jonathan Worent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leons, you forgot to CC the list.
Leons Petrazickis wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
m is for highlighting text that is of some interest to the reader, but
it does not
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
In what way, apart from denoting that something is particularly relevant within
a phrase in a given context, does emphasis change the meaning of something?
The spec gives a good example showing how it changes the meaning.
Leons Petrazickis wrote:
No, m does have semantics. It marks a specific point of interest,
as you might do with a highlighter, it just doesn't alter the meaning
of the text itself.
m isn't really needed for revision tracking, we have ins and
del for that. Though, another use case is
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:01:52 +0530, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
In what way, apart from denoting that something is particularly relevant
within
a phrase in a given context, does emphasis change the meaning of something?
The spec gives a good example
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:16:09 +0530, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Strong provides a strong emphasis, no?
One is stronger than the other. Given that HTML5 allows nesting of
emphasis,
there is not much point in having the strong element as well, is
there? If em
refers to the importance
