On 4/19/07, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:07:09 +0100, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As such, encouraging people to include alt tags means the difference
between me knowing that there's an image I care to look at and not.
If e-mail client automatically
I did some testing on id= and name= on iframe, object and map...
http://hasather.net/test/html/id-vs-name/
(Thanks to David for uploading them -- FTP didn't work for me today.)
In the table below, A means link opens in iframe, B means link opens
in new window, C means link opens in same
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:04:32 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Test | Gecko WebKit Opera IE7 | Title| Notes
++---+--
[...]
003.xml | B A B - | object name | -
On 4/21/07, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is an object with empty fallback content different from an
img with an empty alt value? It seems like it is just as ambiguous,
since if the fallback content were non-empty it should be substituted.
I guess made an assumption that
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:43:14 +0200, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/4/19, Matthew Paul Thomas:
Thunderbird allows you to set 'alt' ...
When you drag/drop an image into a message, the default is alt=.
Setting a default of alt= is bad behaviour, since the program has no way of
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:08:33 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 19, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I do think that for blogs or wikis where you are publishing to
the web audience at large, the editing tools should make it
