Adrian Sutton wrote:
That said, by default our editor outputs the span tag version because we
like to follow standards and I recommend using our styles menu to apply CSS
classes and appropriate structural markup (headings etc). We did however
have to go back and add an option to output font
On 2/5/07 4:59 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Adrian Sutton wrote:
That said, by default our editor outputs the span tag version because we
like to follow standards and I recommend using our styles menu to apply CSS
classes and appropriate structural markup (headings
On 1 May 2007, at 20:21, Brenton Strine wrote:
However, if I then wanted to add additional special
styling to the first and third div, (e.g.. a border and
background color) it is less graceful. I could add style
attributes, but that would be wasteful if I want to do
this on a large scale.
At 11:01 +1000 UTC, on 2007-05-02, Adrian Sutton wrote:
On 2/5/07 1:28 AM, Sander Tekelenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
can you explain exactly how span is much more difficult to work
with, and for whom?
Quite a number of the cheap HTML to PDF conversion processes don't support
CSS.
At 17:04 -0400 1/05/07, Brian Campbell wrote:
On May 1, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Kevin Calhoun wrote:
I believe that a cue point is reached if its time is traversed
during playback.
What does traversed mean in terms of (a) seeking across the cue
point (b) playing in reverse (rewinding) and (c)
