On Fri, 11 May 2007, Thomas Broyer wrote:
2007/5/11, Ian Hickson:
Here are some more tests for you:
http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/html/canvas/
You're using !DOCTYPE HTML5 instead of !DOCTYPE HTML, is this a
mistake or have I missed a change in the spec? This should hopefully
The scripts should test the canvas variable before use. It is empty in IE7
and using it causes a runtime error.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 4:20 AM
To: Benjamin Joffe
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:11:39 +0200, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The scripts should test the canvas variable before use. It is empty in
IE7 and using it causes a runtime error.
That's perfectly fine for tests.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Hi Ian,
concerning when to apply transformations, I think it makes much sense to
let the spec reflect the current reality of Safari and Firefox instead
of the other way around for the following reasons:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-April/010937.html
The referenced
In response to
http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2007/05/09/forward-towards-the-past
I contacted Tommy Olsson to discuss the issue further, and we agreed to
forward the discussion to the list. I've translated it from swedish so any
grammatical errors are my fault. :-)
On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:54:55 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Webbläsare kan inte göra så mycket skoj med p. Oavsett vad specen
säger
att en p representerar.
Oops, forgot to translate this part. It says:
Browsers can't do anything fancy with p. Regardless of what the spec
On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:54:55 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems like the premises of the working group are something completely
different from what I personally would have wished for further
development of one of the most important standards on the web. That is
yet
The speculative wording of HTML5 is actually less accurate because it refers
to a platform control which need not exist at all. The imperative wording
of HTML4 is both clearer and more accurate.
The Label class described at
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Alfonso Baqueiro wrote:
I wrote this little page to try the canvas
http://guia.sytes.net/notas/javascript/biorritmos.html
Is interesting that the drawed vertical 1px width black lines appear as
2px width gray lines (in firefox) I suposse that is a colateral effect
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, carmen wrote:
suppose one is building a GUI with solely canvas elements.
i suppose i should have researched canvas - it looks like it doesn't
have elemnts one might be faimilar with the Tk canvas - you can only
draw using javascript. are there plans to support html
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Jordan OSETE wrote:
Clipping-paths:
---
Right now if i understand it correctly, the clip() function creates a new
clipping path, being the intersection of the last clipping path.
I have not seen any way to actually come back to a full clipping path, apart
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Jordan OSETE wrote:
Currently, there are only ways to _set_ the last point of a subpath
(through any of the To() commands), but not to read it. Since it
must be kept in the UA's memory anyway, why not have a getLastPoint()
function? If not, it forces the user to
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Jordan OSETE wrote:
Reading colors can be complex. Right now it returns a string either in
the form #xx or rgba(...), depending on the alpha value. It means
the reader must be able to parse both, because he never knows if the
color's alpha is 255 or less. Maybe
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The specification doesn't define what should happen when the image is
still in the loading state. Does drawImage() / createPattern() wait for
it to be loaded or do you need the methods from within a load event
listener.
Wow, you raised this
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Stefan Haustein wrote:
concerning when to apply transformations, I think it makes much sense to
let the spec reflect the current reality of Safari and Firefox instead
of the other way around for the following reasons:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Mathieu HENRI wrote:
The ImageData [1] object used in Canvas should be instantiable like
HTMLImageElement are using the Image constructor [2,3].
You can already do that:
var imagedata = {
height: 1,
width: 1,
data: [0,0,0,0]
};
* Specify the
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
The specification should probably indicate that for non-positive
arguments for the widht and height this method must throw an
INDEX_SIZE_ERR exception.
Done.
It would also be nice if it was made more explicit that the height and
width you ask
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Philip Taylor wrote:
I was wondering how accurately the canvas specification matches with
the current implementations, so I've done a bit of work on testing the
first parts of it (up to Transformations, i.e. the easy/unexciting bits)
- the results suggest there isn't
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Philip Taylor wrote:
[...] in some of the cases I had to guess what would be an acceptable
result when the spec doesn't specify it
Do you have any record of which cases the spec doesn't cover?
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Philip Taylor wrote:
A couple of points that are unclear and are causing differences between
current implementations (which is presumably a bad thing):
interface HTMLCanvasElement says attribute long width;. #reflect
says If a reflecting DOM attribute is a signed
On 12/05/07, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Philip Taylor wrote:
[...] in some of the cases I had to guess what would be an acceptable
result when the spec doesn't specify it
Do you have any record of which cases the spec doesn't cover?
I believe I've sent emails
On Sat, 12 May 2007, Philip Taylor wrote:
Do you have any record of which cases the spec doesn't cover?
I believe I've sent emails about all the issues I've found so far. At
some point (hopefully not too long) I intend to go back and fix any
tests where the spec has changed, and I'll
Where do you have your test cases for document.write?
I have some examples showing rather funky behavior across browsers and
wanted to check to see if these cases have already been addressed. Some are
rather obvious; others are not.
David
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:31 PM
Subject: Re:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
When an author uses a new class name not defined by either this
specification or the Wiki page, conformance checkers may offer to add
the value to the Wiki, with the details described above, with the
proposal status.
It has been pointed out to me that the offers would
24 matches
Mail list logo
