Re: [whatwg] Possible alternative to specifying a codec for the video tag

2007-12-24 Thread Krzysztof Żelechowski
Dnia 23-12-2007, N o godzinie 13:08 +, David Gerard pisze: On 23/12/2007, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How could we do that? The codec is usually a relatively small download download compared to the video itself. If we could suggest a way for codecs to be provided

Re: [whatwg] Possible alternative to specifying a codec for the video tag

2007-12-24 Thread David Gerard
On 24/12/2007, Krzysztof Żelechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dnia 23-12-2007, N o godzinie 13:08 +, David Gerard pisze: On 23/12/2007, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How could we do that? The codec is usually a relatively small download download compared to the video

Re: [whatwg] must only ambiguity

2007-12-24 Thread Krzysztof Żelechowski
Dnia 21-12-2007, Pt o godzinie 17:28 +, Philip Taylor pisze: Documents and document fragments / Structure says Authors must only use elements in the HTML namespace in the contexts where they are allowed, as defined for each element. That phrase is unclear. It could be interpreted as:

Re: [whatwg] must only ambiguity

2007-12-24 Thread L. David Baron
On Monday 2007-12-24 19:07 +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote: My rewording for competition: Authors may use elements in the HTML namespace in the contexts where they are explicitly allowed and nowhere else. My rewording for competition: Authors may put elements inside an element only if