On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:51:29 +0100, Henry Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's recently been some talk about completely removing HTML 5 section
6.2, Server-sent DOM events. I propose that rather than remove, we
revise.
I agree that we should keep it.
- Continued problems of the 2
Henry Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's recently been some talk about completely removing HTML 5
section 6.2, Server-sent DOM events. I propose that rather than
remove, we revise.
The major concerns I've heard about section 6.2 include:
- Unnecessary dependency on DOM Events
Has anyone considered Bink video as a viable option?
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkmain.htm
Bink is a better-than-DVD class codec - it compresses at higher
quality than DVD
at up to three times the playback speed!
Bink uses up to 16 MB less memory at runtime than other codecs.
It has been
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
- Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server
scalability
Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate
domains and have cross-domain working?
Simply get rid of, or significantly raise, the limit? Standards work
related to this
Out of the question, it must be royalty-free. That's one of the requirements,
so unless you can convince the holder to go RF, no chance.
El Lunes 07 Ene 2008, Federico Bianco Prevot escribió:
Has anyone considered Bink video as a viable option?
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkmain.htm
Bink
Dan Mosedale wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
- Continued problems of the 2 connection limit on HTTP server
scalability
Is there any realistic solution to this other than to use separate
domains and have cross-domain working?
Simply get rid of, or significantly raise, the limit? Standards
If you need to pay ¢1 for copies distributed, then it isn't royalty free and
it can't be on the standard as a requirement. Flat fee is not royalty free.
YES, I MEANT BEING ABLE TO USE IT WITHOUT PAYING ANY KIND OF FEE.
Am I too daft for my words to be understood?
El Lunes 07 Ene 2008,
At 19:29 +0100 7/01/08, Federico Bianco Prevot wrote:
Has anyone considered Bink video as a viable option?
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkmain.htm
I get the impression that this is not an openly-specified codec,
which I rather think is a problem. That is, there is neither a
publicly
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:50:09PM -0800, Dave Singer wrote:
I get the impression that this is not an openly-specified codec,
which I rather think is a problem. That is, there is neither a
publicly available spec. nor publicly-available source, which means
that it is controlled by one
On 07/01/2008, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 19:29 +0100 7/01/08, Federico Bianco Prevot wrote:
Has anyone considered Bink video as a viable option?
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkmain.htm
I get the impression that this is not an openly-specified codec,
which I rather think is a
I don't find anything objectionable with that suggestion. It gives us the
best of two worlds. Of course, should x264 be freed, there would be no
longer any reason not to put Ogg alongside x264 in the spec as MUST.
I have a suggestion:
Nokia, Apple: you want H.264, you free H.264. Make it
At 21:59 + 7/01/08, David Gerard wrote:
On 07/01/2008, Dave Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 19:29 +0100 7/01/08, Federico Bianco Prevot wrote:
Has anyone considered Bink video as a viable option?
http://www.radgametools.com/bnkmain.htm
I get the impression that this is not an
[snip]
How about this permathread gets a @whatwg.org mailing list all of its own?
Just a suggestion...
dan
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:51:29 -, Henry Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Unnecessary dependency on DOM Events
This feature is inherently event-based. I think it does make sense to
re-use existing framework for event handling.
However, I haven't found use-case for remote triggering of
14 matches
Mail list logo
