Hi Charles,
You are correct that the current draft leaves this aspect of the
controls attribute unspecified. The video implementation available in
the WebKit nightlies uses overlay controls that fade away during
playback and don't affect the size of the video box. I saw a Firefox
demo
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:06:53 +0100, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies in advance if I've missed these details in the specification.
The video element supports width and height. Does this include the
additional area needed (if necessary) by the controls? It strikes me
that it
Matthew Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-01-27 23:02 +:
[...]
The specification could include an explicit statement of the form UAs
must ignore the accesskey= attribute, but any such statement would be
in the yet-to-be-written Rendering section.
That statement would conflict with
Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-01-28 18:39 +1100:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:02:26 +1100, Matthew Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Since most pages that contain links don't also use accesskey=, handset
vendors should find a way to allow easy navigation of links
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Jerason Banes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-01-25 23:41 -0600:
Long story short, accesskeys were an idea that worked better on paper than
they did in practice. They inevitably interfered with normal browser
operation as well as other
Dnia 25-01-2008, Pt o godzinie 23:06 -0500, Jean-Nicolas Boulay
Desjardins pisze:
In the present standard you are alowd to use the same accesskey in to
different links... For example:
a href=bob.html accesskey=bBob web page/a
a href=bob.html accesskey=bBob web page/a
But what would
Thank you Erik - this is what I was looking for.
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xhtml.com
Original Message
From: Erik Dahlstr�m
Date: 2008-01-28 11:16 AM
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:34:32 +0100, Vlad Alexander (xhtml.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks Erik, but I still
Antti,
Thanks for the response.
The video implementation available in the WebKit nightlies uses
overlay controls that fade away during playback and don't affect
the size of the video box. I saw a Firefox demo of this feature
that took similar approach as well.
Does WebKit do this whether
On 28.1.2008, at 13:51, Charles wrote:
Antti,
Thanks for the response.
The video implementation available in the WebKit nightlies uses
overlay controls that fade away during playback and don't affect
the size of the video box. I saw a Firefox demo of this feature
that took similar approach
Dnia 25-01-2008, Pt o godzinie 15:05 -0800, Oliver Hunt pisze:
Ah true I had forgotten that, however this still fails for non-
integral ratios :-/
Non-integral ratios can be approximated by a series of rational ones.
Chris
Hi Erik,
Thanks Erik, but I still don't get it. Can you please help me better understand
the following:
1. What do the IMG element's width and height attributes establish?
2. In order to reproduce the same stretching behaviour using IMG element and
SVG that exists between the IMG element and
The video element offers an interface to the native media
playback capabilities of the platform.
The browser platform (e.g. WebKit), the multimedia platform (e.g. QuickTime)
or the OS platform (e.g. Mac OS X)?
It is not a plug-in mechanism and it is not suitable for embedding
things like
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:31:46 +1100, Krzysztof Żelechowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia 25-01-2008, Pt o godzinie 23:06 -0500, Jean-Nicolas Boulay
Desjardins pisze:
...
But what would happend if this was to happend:
a href=bob.html accesskey=bBob web page/a
a href=alex.html accesskey=bAlex
Alpha component is equal to 1.
The color is an uppercase six-digit hexadecimal value, prefixed with a
# character
(U+0023 NUMBER SIGN), with the first two digits representing the red component,
the next two digits representing the green component, and the last two
digits representing the blue
On Jan 29, 2008, at 01:32, Charles wrote:
So for Safari on both Macintosh and Windows, is Apple's intent that
video
will only work for formats supported by QuickTime?
And given that little internet content targets QuickTime, who
exactly will
be using the video tag?
Even though video
15 matches
Mail list logo
