Hi,
It's a comment to the character encoding declaration
section of HTML 5 spec:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#character1
During the development of CJK information processing, many
text encodings is just a strict subset of another one, for
example, GB2312 is a subset of GBK, GBK is a subset
Dnia 02-03-2008, N o godzinie 23:02 +, Ian Hickson pisze:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Simon Pieters wrote:
Aha. I didn't think of testing attributes.
Safari preserves CRs in attribute values, both real and NCRs. CRLF
pairs, LFCR pairs, CRs and LFs cause a single linebreak in the
Dnia 01-03-2008, So o godzinie 19:37 -0800, Nicholas C. Zakas pisze:
Reading your description makes me think that you're more displeased
with the hn/ elements than you are happy with the section/
element. I've never had issues promoting headers or moving content
around, and I'm not clear
Dnia 01-03-2008, So o godzinie 19:36 -0800, Nicholas C. Zakas pisze:
I understand your reasoning for the aside/ element, perhaps this is
another element that is suffering from the wrong name. Most of web
developers have no idea what an aside is let alone when to use one. I
know that acronym/
Dnia 01-03-2008, So o godzinie 17:12 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak pisze:
On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
For example on a a href=..., does the user hovering the node
count?
If you display an absolute URI to the user at this time it should get
resolved against the current
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
When I want to define a paragraph-style tool-tip, I am left with the
following choice: either make the source code unreadable by making an
excessively long line (this is also true for URI attributes but they are
not expected to be readable)
On 03/03/2008, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
When I want to define a paragraph-style tool-tip, I am left with the
following choice: either make the source code unreadable by making an
excessively long line (this is also true for
Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
Dnia 01-03-2008, So o godzinie 17:12 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak pisze:
On Mar 1, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
For example on a a href=..., does the user hovering the node
count?
If you display an absolute URI to the user at this time it should get
David Gerard wrote:
On 03/03/2008, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
When I want to define a paragraph-style tool-tip, I am left with the
following choice: either make the source code unreadable by making an
excessively long line
I would like to request that the canvas element get the same usemap
and ismap properties that the img element has.
It seems the canvas tag was designed primarily for fairly simple
dynamic data visualizations, but even so, having some basic, built-in,
intuitive methods for interacting with these
Dnia 01-03-2008, So o godzinie 19:36 -0800, Nicholas C. Zakas pisze:
Perhaps it would better be named callout/?
Aside is customary in dialogue annotations,
I have never seen any callout.
Chris
Call it note. It may sound crude but it's hard to mistake its meaning.
Shannon
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 23:02:07 + (UTC), Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
Currently, unquoted attributes may start with a =
[as in img alt==Foobar src='404']
This means that the notion of conformance fails to catch what is most
likely an error: [...]
To
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:21:20 + (UTC), Ian Hickson wrote:
(I've made the characters not allowed in XML also not allowed in HTML,
with the exception of some of the space characters which we need to have
allowed for legacy reasons.)
The C1 character U+0085 NEXT LINE (NEL) is also a Unicode
Wouldn't it make more sense just to use SVG?
Rob
--
He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the
Wouldn't it make more sense just to use SVG?
Dynamic interactive charts and graphs seem to fall into the gray area
between what is more appropriate for canvas or SVG.
canvas is designed for creating images dynamically in scripts. SVG
focuses on pre-computed image documents, and is more complex
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:40:52 +0900, Greg Houston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense just to use SVG?
...
So canvas is tuned more for creating dynamic charts and graphs whereas
SVG is better apt for static sprites and interface elements with the
bonus that it can
16 matches
Mail list logo
