On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I'm coming around to the opinion that , , and (and the new list
> elements in html5) should allow a larger set of elements as their direc
Dnia 26-03-2008, Śr o godzinie 12:42 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. pisze:
>
> I'm coming around to the opinion that , , and (and the
> new list elements in html5) should allow a larger set of elements as
> their direct children. I've been playing around with within
> or (with the intended s
On Mar 25, 2008, at 21:44, Keryx Web wrote:
The and then have to be wrapped inside the list item.
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3
For various legacy parsing reasons and in the table case for CSS table
model reasons, this kind of thing is seriously more trouble for
implementors than it is wort
Dnia 26-03-2008, Śr o godzinie 12:15 -0500, Tab Atkins Jr. pisze:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Żelechowski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another example of missing interleave in HTML is
> not to be able to interleave list items with table rows
> in o
