A little while ago, this change - http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=1429to=1430
- was meant to update the spec for consistency with WebIDL
In this change, the following passage was removed from the Storage
section:
In the ECMAScript DOM binding, enumerating a Storage object must
Hi Brady.
Brady Eidson:
A little while ago, this change -
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=1429to=1430 - was meant to
update the spec for consistency with WebIDL
In this change, the following passage was removed from the Storage
section:
In the ECMAScript DOM binding,
On May 18, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
A little while ago, this change - http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=1429to=1430
- was meant to update the spec for consistency with WebIDL
In this change, the following passage was removed from the Storage
section:
In the
On May 18, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
While I'm on the topic, I'm also curious about that [XXX]
placeholder.
There's a bug in WebKit's bugzilla pointing out that the IE8 beta
and Firefox 2 both support `delete storage.keyName` syntax as an
alias for
