On Jul 30, 2008, at 23:29, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Wrong.
Microformats may also be used to mark up events that happened in the
past and people who are dead. For example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Disney
What use case is served by marking up Walt Disney's birthday as bday?
(The e-mails included in this reply were all cc'ed to whatwg, but some
were also cc'ed to other mailing lists. To reduce cross-posting, I've only
included [EMAIL PROTECTED] on this reply, since that was the only list
that was included on all the e-mails. If you reply, feel free to respond
on
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Simon Pieters wrote:
There are also alternative suggestions, like making a contain any
element. Unfortunately, none of these end up working (e.g. for this
proposal, ap/a would create an unexpected DOM -- we'd have to
make /p end tags not optional when
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Peter Kasting wrote:
- Otherwise, if the element is not larger than the viewport, scroll
such
that the element is centered* in the viewport (within the scrolling
limits
-- if the element
The current version of Minefield (the pre-3.1 nightlies) has Ogg
Vorbis and Ogg Theora support.
You can try these out using Wikimedia Commons video:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Video
The current MediaWiki video code defaults to everything else first,
but load the video then
Andres,
Thanks for your long effort in this issue. I know there is many issues of
more secure solution and specification for financial transactions. But, it
has been processed most of bank transaction and cyber trading in web browser
form. So new protocol and new specification is not good
Thanks for your follow up about long silence issue.
In my understanding, the implementation guide of browsers is most important
part of HTML5.
As you know, web browsers have offered the authentication of client
certificate over SSL per web site. It is widely used by many companies and
David Gerard schrieb:
Is the video tag doing Ogg Theora in Opera yet?
In experimental builds, yes.
I'm sure Apple and Nokia can join the party at their leisure.
I assume the latest move by Mozilla (which I think is great, obviously)
won't do anything to address the IP concerns of
2008/7/31 Maik Merten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Gerard schrieb:
I'm sure Apple and Nokia can join the party at their leisure.
I assume the latest move by Mozilla (which I think is great, obviously)
won't do anything to address the IP concerns of mentioned players.
The IP concerns are
Believe it or not, Yes!
Consider the couple to be congratulated on their gazillionth anniversary. Is
that diamond, gold, platinum? Whatever it is, if your
date time system is limited to epoch 1970, you're out of luck. That's why I
claim that restrictions (rigorously documented) are OK
as long
David Gerard schrieb:
I'm sure Apple and Nokia can join the party at their leisure.
I assume the latest move by Mozilla (which I think is great, obviously)
won't do anything to address the IP concerns of mentioned players.
The IP concerns are blatant FUD and it's ridiculous
David Gerard schrieb:
The IP concerns are blatant FUD and it's ridiculous to describe them
in any other terms.
While I do agree that the IP concerns may actually be blown out of
proportion (after all the current state of being in a limbo, leaving the
field completely to proprietary
2008/7/31 Maik Merten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Gerard schrieb:
The IP concerns are blatant FUD and it's ridiculous to describe them
in any other terms.
While I do agree that the IP concerns may actually be blown out of
proportion (after all the current state of being in a limbo, leaving the
David Gerard schrieb:
Ignoring IE, Firefox 3.1 will have this Just Work. So, as I said,
it'll be a process of them deciding whether there are business reasons
to come along at their leisure.
Yes, business reasons are usually indeed good reasons for businesses ;-)
The second-biggest browser
Maik Merten schrieb:
If for sure welcome the stance of Mozilla and Opera to support
royality-free-for-any-purpose formats and I hope other vendors will
follow this path.
This sentence doesn't parse. Patched version:
I for sure welcome the stance of Mozilla and Opera to support
Henri Sivonen wrote:
What use case is served by marking up Walt Disney's birthday as bday?
Surely people aren't supposed to export Walt Disney's contact
information to their address book app and have it remind them to
congratulate Walt on his birthday.
Again, you're thinking entirely in
WeBMartians wrote:
Believe it or not, Yes!
Consider the couple to be congratulated on their gazillionth anniversary. Is
that diamond, gold, platinum? Whatever it is, if your
date time system is limited to epoch 1970, you're out of luck. That's why I
claim that restrictions (rigorously
Please explain why you consider concatenating JavaScript sources dirty.
I don't necessarily think it's dirty, but any choices that game the system
for purely performance reasons seem hackish to me. Concatenating js files
for performance reasons is certainly less offensive than css sprites, but
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded0.html#seamless
doesn't seem to say what happens to overflowing content in seamless
iframes.
Overflowing content seems likely to occur with the default values of
'width' and 'height', in at least the case where content inside the
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, L. David Baron wrote:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded0.html#seamless
doesn't seem to say what happens to overflowing content in seamless
iframes.
Overflowing content seems likely to occur with the default values of
'width' and
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Marco wrote:
I've been looking through the HTML5 working draft and I've been trying
to find a reference for the use of the current PICS labels.
HTML5 currently doesn't define PICS support, but it allows authors to
define extensions for meta name and link rel by
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:11:08 +0200, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original idea (apparently not well conveyed in the spec) is that it
doesn't actually affect the rendering model at all -- it's still an
iframe, it just doesn't have a
Something I think is really missing from HTML is linked text (in the
traditional desktop publishing sense), where two or more text boxes are
joined so that content overflows the first into the second and
subsequent boxes. This is a standard process for practically all
multi-column magazines,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Shannon wrote:
Something I think is really missing from HTML is linked text (in the
traditional desktop publishing sense), where two or more text boxes are
joined so that content overflows the first into the second and
subsequent boxes. This is a standard process for
I agree this is _mostly_ a CSS issue except that there is semantic
meaning to the join attribute beyond layout. The attribute could serve
as a guide to search engines, web-scrapers or WYSIWYG applications that
two areas of the page should be considered a single piece of content. I
am also
25 matches
Mail list logo
